Literature DB >> 17650122

Neural activation state determines behavioral susceptibility to modified theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Juha Silvanto1, Neil G Muggleton, Alan Cowey, Vincent Walsh.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allows one to investigate the effects of temporary interference of neural processing in neurologically intact subjects. In a previous study [J. Silvanto et al. (2007) Eur. J. Neurosci., 25, 1874-1881] we found that online TMS perceptually facilitates the attributes encoded by the least active neural populations. The objective of the present experiment was to extend this work to determine whether such state-dependent effects can be observed when offline high-frequency TMS is applied to suppress neural activity. The activity levels of direction-selective neural populations in the V1/V2 region were modulated by asking subjects to passively view either leftward or rightward motion during offline TMS. In a subsequent motion direction-discrimination task, their ability to discriminate motion direction was dependent on the type of motion they had passively viewed during offline TMS: detection of the congruent direction (i.e. direction viewed during offline TMS) was unaffected, whereas detection of the incongruent direction (i.e. opposite direction to the one viewed during offline TMS) was impaired. As the activity level of neurons tuned to the incongruent direction was presumably lower during the TMS than of those tuned to the congruent direction, this behavioral result demonstrates that the offline TMS preferentially suppressed attributes encoded by the least active neural populations. In contrast to direction discrimination, motion detection was not impaired in a direction-specific manner. This shows that the requirements of the psychophysical task, in conjunction with the relative activity states of neuronal populations when TMS is applied, can be used to selectively interfere with overlapping neuronal populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17650122     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05682.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  28 in total

1.  Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Zaira Cattaneo; Lorella Battelli; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A double dissociation between striate and extrastriate visual cortex for pattern motion perception revealed using rTMS.

Authors:  Benjamin Thompson; Craig Aaen-Stockdale; Lisa Koski; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lindsay Oberman; Dylan Edwards; Mark Eldaief; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 4.  Tinbergen on mirror neurons.

Authors:  Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Transcranial magnetic brain stimulation: therapeutic promises and scientific gaps.

Authors:  Eric M Wassermann; Trelawny Zimmermann
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 6.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Improved discrimination of visual stimuli following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Michael L Waterston; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Psychophysical and rTMS Evidence for the Presence of Motion Opponency in Human V5.

Authors:  Benjamin Thompson; Choi Deblieck; Allan Wu; Marco Iacoboni; Zili Liu
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Multiple sessions of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in focal hand dystonia: clinical and physiological effects.

Authors:  Teresa Jacobson Kimberley; Michael R Borich; Sanjeev Arora; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 10.  A review of combined TMS-EEG studies to characterize lasting effects of repetitive TMS and assess their usefulness in cognitive and clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Gregor Thut; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.