Literature DB >> 17647066

Patient, physician, pharmacy, and pharmacy benefit design factors related to generic medication use.

William H Shrank1, Margaret Stedman, Susan L Ettner, Dee DeLapp, June Dirstine, M Alan Brookhart, Michael A Fischer, Jerry Avorn, Steven M Asch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased use of generic medications conserves insurer and patient financial resources and may increase patient adherence.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to evaluate whether physician, patient, pharmacy benefit design, or pharmacy characteristics influence the likelihood that patients will use generic drugs DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational analysis of 2001-2003 pharmacy claims from a large health plan in the Western United States. We evaluated claims for 5,399 patients who filled a new prescription in at least 1 of 5 classes of chronic medications with generic alternatives. We identified patients initiated on generic drugs and those started on branded medications who switched to generic drugs in the subsequent year. We used generalized estimating equations to perform separate analyses assessing the relationship between independent variables and the probability that patients were initiated on or switched to generic drugs.
RESULTS: Of the 5,399 new prescriptions filled, 1,262 (23.4%) were generics. Of those initiated on branded medications, 606 (14.9%) switched to a generic drug in the same class in the subsequent year. After regression adjustment, patients residing in high-income zip codes were more likely to initiate treatment with a generic than patients in low-income regions (RR = 1.29; 95% C.I. 1.04-1.60); medical subspecialists (RR = 0.82; 0.69-0.95) and obstetrician/gynecologists (RR = 0.81; 0.69-0.98) were less likely than generalist physicians to initiate generics. Pharmacy benefit design and pharmacy type were not associated with initiation of generic medications. However, patients were over 2.5 times more likely to switch from branded to generic medications if they were enrolled in 3-tier pharmacy plans (95% C.I. 1.12-6.09), and patients who used mail-order pharmacies were 60% more likely to switch to a generic (95% C.I. 1.18-2.30) after initiating treatment with a branded drug.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician and patient factors have an important influence on generic drug initiation, with the patients who live in the poorest zip codes paradoxically receiving generic drugs least often. While tiered pharmacy benefit designs and mail-order pharmacies helped steer patients towards generic medications once the first prescription has been filled, they had little effect on initial prescriptions. Providing patients and physicians with information about generic alternatives may reduce costs and lead to more equitable care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17647066      PMCID: PMC2219782          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0284-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  29 in total

1.  Health spending growth up in 1999; faster growth expected in the future.

Authors:  S Heffler; K Levit; S Smith; C Smith; C Cowan; H Lazenby; M Freeland
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Self-reported physician specialties and the primary care content of medical practice: a study of the AMA physician masterfile. American Medical Association.

Authors:  J A Shea; P R Kletke; G D Wozniak; D Polsky; J J Escarce
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Effect of incentive-based formularies on drug utilization and spending.

Authors:  William H Shrank
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  The effects of prescription drug cost sharing: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Teresa B Gibson; Ronald J Ozminkowski; Ron Z Goetzel
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 5.  Increasing generic drug use in Medicare Part D: the role of government.

Authors:  Herb Kohl; William H Shrank
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: evidence from national samples.

Authors:  A T Geronimus; J Bound
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Do the incentives in 3-tier pharmaceutical benefit plans operate as intended? Results from a physician leadership survey.

Authors:  William H Shrank; Henry N Young; Susan L Ettner; Peter Glassman; Steven M Asch; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Potential savings from increased use of generic drugs in the elderly: what the experience of Medicaid and other insurance programs means for a Medicare drug benefit.

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Economic implications of evidence-based prescribing for hypertension: can better care cost less?

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Pharmacy benefits and the use of drugs by the chronically ill.

Authors:  Dana P Goldman; Geoffrey F Joyce; Jose J Escarce; Jennifer E Pace; Matthew D Solomon; Marianne Laouri; Pamela B Landsman; Steven M Teutsch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  23 in total

1.  Impact of generic substitution decision support on electronic prescribing behavior.

Authors:  Shane P Stenner; Qingxia Chen; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Specification Issues in a Big Data Context: Controlling for the Endogeneity of Consumer and Provider Behaviours in Healthcare Treatment Effects Models.

Authors:  William H Crown
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Sources of regional variation in Medicare Part D drug spending.

Authors:  Julie M Donohue; Nancy E Morden; Walid F Gellad; Julie P Bynum; Weiping Zhou; Joseph T Hanlon; Jonathan Skinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The influence of targeted education on medication persistence and generic substitution among consumer-directed health care enrollees.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sedjo; Emily R Cox
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  A comparison of drug formularies and the potential for cost-savings.

Authors:  Andrea L Kjos; Jon C Schommer; Yingli Yuan
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2010-09

6.  Perception of generic prescription drugs and utilization of generic drug discount programs.

Authors:  Anthony Omojasola; Mike Hernandez; Sujit Sansgiry; Lovell Jones
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 7.  Influencers of generic drug utilization: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer N Howard; Ilene Harris; Gavriella Frank; Zippora Kiptanui; Jingjing Qian; Richard Hansen
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2017-08-04

8.  State generic substitution laws can lower drug outlays under Medicaid.

Authors:  William H Shrank; Niteesh K Choudhry; Jessica Agnew-Blais; Alex D Federman; Joshua N Liberman; Jun Liu; Aaron S Kesselheim; M Alan Brookhart; Michael A Fischer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  The comparative effectiveness of mail order pharmacy use vs. local pharmacy use on LDL-C control in new statin users.

Authors:  Julie A Schmittdiel; Andrew J Karter; Wendy Dyer; Melissa Parker; Connie Uratsu; James Chan; O Kenrik Duru
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Impact of medicare part D plan features on use of generic drugs.

Authors:  Yan Tang; Walid F Gellad; Aiju Men; Julie M Donohue
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.