Literature DB >> 17646923

How many for dinner? Recruitment and monitoring by glances in capuchins.

Hélène Meunier1, Jean-Louis Deneubourg, Odile Petit.   

Abstract

Group members present physical and physiological differences according to their age, sex or social status, which could generate motivation differences among individuals during travel. In spite of these divergences of interest among individuals, the group succeeds more often than not in making a collective decision about departure time and which direction to take. To reach a consensus decision, animals should exchange information relating to characteristics of group movement through different communication channels. The main purpose of this study is to understand the function of behaviour patterns displayed during movements of white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). We designed experiments in which we provoked collective movements involving a binary choice. During experiments, a video camera recorded the behaviour of each capuchin, which enabled us to determine which individuals displayed a behavioural pattern during travel and how this behaviour influenced the other group members. We found that looking backwards seemed to permit the recruitment of group mates during collective movement. This behaviour also seemed to allow the quantification of the number of followers, since the emitter modified its locomotion speed according to this number. In this preliminary study, we showed that visual behaviour was used to recruit and monitor group mates during collective movements and provided information on mechanisms involved in maintaining cohesion and coordination among group members during travel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646923     DOI: 10.1007/s10329-007-0055-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Primates        ISSN: 0032-8332            Impact factor:   2.163


  5 in total

1.  Consensus decision making in animals.

Authors:  Larissa Conradt; Timothy J Roper
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 3.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.

Authors:  J Altmann
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.991

4.  Tandem calling: a new kind of signal in ant communication.

Authors:  M Möglich; U Maschwitz; B Hölldobler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Communication about the environment in a group of young chimpanzees.

Authors:  E W Menzel
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 1.246

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  How does the expressiveness of leaders affect followership in domestic horses (Equus ferus caballus)?

Authors:  Caroline Gérard; Mathilde Valenchon; Nicolas Poulin; Odile Petit
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Collective decision-making in white-faced capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  O Petit; J Gautrais; J-B Leca; G Theraulaz; J-L Deneubourg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Communication and Cognition in Primate Group Movement.

Authors:  Julia Fischer; Dietmar Zinner
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Is leadership a reliable concept in animals? An empirical study in the horse.

Authors:  Marie Bourjade; Bernard Thierry; Martine Hausberger; Odile Petit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Tibetan Macaques with Higher Social Centrality and More Relatives Emit More Frequent Visual Communication in Collective Decision-Making.

Authors:  Zifei Tang; Xi Wang; Mingyang Wu; Shiwang Chen; Jinhua Li
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.