Literature DB >> 17646840

Benefits of FES gait in a spinal cord injured population.

E J Nightingale1, J Raymond, J W Middleton, J Crosbie, G M Davis.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Review.
OBJECTIVES: This review article investigated the objective evidence of benefits derived from functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted gait for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Both FES and gait have been proposed to promote not only augmented health and fitness, but specific ambulatory outcomes for individuals with neurological disabilities. However, due to small sample sizes and the lack of functionality of the intervention, it has not been widely used in clinical practice. This review assessed whether there is sufficient evidence to encourage a more widespread deployment of FES gait within the rehabilitation community.
METHODS: Hand searches and online data collection were performed in Medline and Science Direct. Specific search terms used included SCI/paralysis/paraplegia and tetraplegia with electrical stimulation/FES, gait and walking.
RESULTS: The searches generated 532 papers. Of these papers, 496 were excluded and 36 papers were included in the review. Many reported benefits were not carefully investigated, and small sample sizes or different methodologies resulted in insufficient evidence to draw definitive conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS: FES gait can enhance gait, muscle strength and cardiorespiratory fitness for people with SCI. However, these benefits are dependent on the nature of the injury and further research is required to generalize these results to the widespread population of SCI individuals. Proof of the functionality and further evidence of the benefits of FES gait will assist in FES gait gaining clinical acceptance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646840     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  24 in total

Review 1.  Implantable neurotechnologies: electrical stimulation and applications.

Authors:  Sudip Nag; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Neurorobotic and hybrid management of lower limb motor disorders: a review.

Authors:  Juan C Moreno; Antonio J Del Ama; Ana de Los Reyes-Guzmán; Angel Gil-Agudo; Ramón Ceres; José L Pons
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Functional electrical stimulation for incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Christina Fazio
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2014-10

4.  Adaptive neuron-to-EMG decoder training for FES neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Christian Ethier; Daniel Acuna; Sara A Solla; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Brain-controlled muscle stimulation for the restoration of motor function.

Authors:  Christian Ethier; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 6.  Training to achieve over ground walking after spinal cord injury: a review of who, what, when, and how.

Authors:  Jaynie F Yang; Kristin E Musselman
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Comparison of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for spasticity in spinal cord injury - A pilot randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; John M Solomon; Natarajan Manikandan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging in chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  B M Ellingson; J L Ulmer; S N Kurpad; B D Schmit
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Restoration of grasp following paralysis through brain-controlled stimulation of muscles.

Authors:  C Ethier; E R Oby; M J Bauman; L E Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Long-Term Performance and User Satisfaction With Implanted Neuroprostheses for Upright Mobility After Paraplegia: 2- to 14-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ronald J Triolo; Stephanie Nogan Bailey; Kevin M Foglyano; Rudi Kobetic; Lisa M Lombardo; Michael E Miller; Gilles Pinault
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 4.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.