Literature DB >> 17646815

[Anterior cruciate ligament revision: analysis and results from a series of 74 cases].

J-C Rollier1, J-L Besse, J-L Lerat, B Moyen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This was a retrospective series of patients who underwent revision ligamentoplasty of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). We wanted to assess the functional outcome after this type of surgery and search for potential prognostic factors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The series included 74 patients, mean age 34 years (range 21-59 years). The initial ligamentoplasty was performed with a synthetic ligament (n=16), an autograft (n=57) or an allograft (n=1). Differential laxity (KT-1000 maximal manual) was 7 +/- 2.5 mm. Anterior drawer was measured on the stress x-rays in 20 degrees flexion: medial 8 +/- 4.7 mm, lateral 8.3 +/- 4.9 mm. Mean time to revision surgery was 78 months. Reconstruction was performed arthroscopically in 69 knees. The implant used for the revision reconstruction was an autograft: patellar tendon (n=42), quadriceps tendon (n=15), hamstring tendon (n=13), patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon (MacInJones) (n=3), fascia lata (n=1). A meniscal tear was noted in 24 knees and a cartilage lesion in 35.
RESULTS: Outcome was assessed at mean 21.2 months follow-up. The mean IKDC function score was 71.7 (range 21.8-100). 78% of patients considered their knee normal or nearly normal and 88% presented a positive Lachmann. Mean differential laxity measured with KT-1000 (maximal manual) was 2 +/- 1.7 mm. Stress x-rays revealed a mean differential laxity measured at 3.7 +/- 2.3 mm medially and 6.3 +/- 4.3 mm laterally. The presence of a meniscal lesion favored osteoarthritic degradation. Presence of chondral lesions altered the functional outcome significantly and limited resumption of sports activities. An initial repair using a synthetic ligament affected the functional outcome after revision surgery and favored or aggravated chondral lesions. DISCUSSION: The clinical results we have obtained with revision ACL ligamentoplasty are comparable to previous series reported in the literature. The functional outcome is not as good as after first-intention repair, especially if the initial plasty was done with a synthetic ligament and the knee presented meniscal or cartilage damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646815     DOI: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90275-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot        ISSN: 0035-1040


  2 in total

1.  Revision ACL reconstruction: influence of a lateral tenodesis.

Authors:  Christophe Trojani; Philippe Beaufils; Gilles Burdin; Christophe Bussière; Vincent Chassaing; Patrick Djian; Frédéric Dubrana; François-Paul Ehkirch; Jean-Pierre Franceschi; Christophe Hulet; Franck Jouve; Jean-François Potel; Abderahmane Sbihi; Philippe Neyret; Philippe Colombet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision.

Authors:  Christophe Trojani; Abderahmane Sbihi; Patrick Djian; Jean-François Potel; Christophe Hulet; Frank Jouve; Christophe Bussière; François-Paul Ehkirch; Gilles Burdin; Frédéric Dubrana; Philippe Beaufils; Jean-Pierre Franceschi; Vincent Chassaing; Philippe Colombet; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.