Literature DB >> 17646370

Diagnosis of absent ductus venosus in a population referred for fetal echocardiography: association with a persistent portosystemic shunt requiring postnatal device occlusion.

Ruben J Acherman1, William N Evans, Alvaro Galindo, Juan C Collazos, Abraham Rothman, Gary A Mayman, Carlos F Luna, Robert Rollins, Katrinka T Kip, Dean P Berthody, Humberto Restrepo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this series was to assess the incidence, anatomic variants, and implications of an absent ductus venosus (ADV) in patients referred for fetal echocardiography.
METHODS: We searched our fetal cardiology database for diagnoses of ADV from May 2003 to December 2006.
RESULTS: During the study period, we performed 1328 fetal echocardiographic examinations in 990 fetuses. We found 6 cases of ADV (6/1000). Indications for fetal echocardiography were cardiomegaly, dilated umbilical or systemic veins, and extracardiac abnormalities. We identified 5 anatomic variants of ADV. In 2 patients, the umbilical vein connected to the systemic venous circulation by way of the portal sinus: via an abnormal venous channel from the portal sinus to the right atrium (case 1) and presumably via hepatic sinusoids to the hepatic veins (case 2). In the remaining 4 patients, the umbilical vein bypassed the portal sinus and the liver and connected to the systemic venous circulation via an abnormal venous channel: from the umbilical vein to the right atrium (case 3), from the umbilical vein to the inferior vena cava (cases 4 and 5), and from the umbilical vein to the right iliac vein (case 6). All patients survived; 2 required cardiovascular intervention. No intervention was required in 3 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: An ADV should be ruled out in a fetus with unexplained cardiomegaly or dilatation of the umbilical vein, systemic veins, or portal sinus. To our knowledge, prenatal diagnosis of an ADV with an abnormal communication between the portal sinus and the right atrium has not been reported previously. The portosystemic communication persisted after birth and required device occlusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646370     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.8.1077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  6 in total

1.  Congenital portosystemic shunts and AMPLATZER vascular plug occlusion in newborns.

Authors:  William N Evans; Alvaro Galindo; Ruben J Acherman; Abraham Rothman; Dean P Berthoty
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Pre and postnatal diagnosis of congenital portosystemic shunt: Impact of interventional therapy.

Authors:  Shireen Mreish; Mohamed A Hamdan
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2019-03-15

3.  Prenatal Diagnosis and Outcome of Umbilical-Portal-Systemic Venous Shunts: Experience of a Tertiary Center and Proposal for a New Complex Type.

Authors:  Rodica Daniela Nagy; Dominic Gabriel Iliescu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31

4.  A Newborn with an Alternative Porto-Caval Shunt.

Authors:  Çağrı Damar; Ayşe Gül Alımlı; Betül Emine Derinkuyu; Kudret Ebru Özcan; Asburçe Olgaç; Ali Murat Koç
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-16

5.  Prenatal sonographic characteristics and postnatal outcomes of umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts under the new in-utero classification: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Haifang Wu; Guowei Tao; Xiang Cong; Qi Li; Jing Zhang; Zhe Ma; Zhonglu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Length to width ratio of the ductus venosus in simple screening for fetal congenital heart diseases in the second trimester.

Authors:  Wei-Hsiu Chiu; Shy-Ming Lee; Tao-Hsin Tung; Xiao-Mei Tang; Ren-Shyan Liu; Ran-Chou Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.