Literature DB >> 17646308

Probabilistic whole-genome alignments reveal high indel rates in the human and mouse genomes.

Gerton Lunter1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The two mutation processes that have the largest impact on genome evolution at small scales are substitutions, and sequence insertions and deletions (indels). While the former have been studied extensively, indels have received less attention, and in particular, the problem of inferring indel rates between pairs of divergent sequence remains unsolved. Here, I describe a novel and accurate method for estimating neutral indel rates between divergent pairs of genomes.
RESULTS: Simulations suggest that new method for estimating indel rates is accurate to within 2%, at divergences corresponding to that of human and mouse. Applying the method to these species, I show that indel rates are up to twice higher than is apparent from alignments, and depend strongly on the local G + C content. These results indicate that at these evolutionary distances, the contribution of indels to sequence divergence is much larger than hitherto appreciated. In particular, the ratio of substitution to indel rates between human and mouse appears to be around gamma = 8, rather than the currently accepted value of about gamma = 14.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646308     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  29 in total

1.  Dindel: accurate indel calls from short-read data.

Authors:  Cornelis A Albers; Gerton Lunter; Daniel G MacArthur; Gilean McVean; Willem H Ouwehand; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Problems and solutions for estimating indel rates and length distributions.

Authors:  Reed A Cartwright
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Uncertainty in homology inferences: assessing and improving genomic sequence alignment.

Authors:  Gerton Lunter; Andrea Rocco; Naila Mimouni; Andreas Heger; Alexandre Caldeira; Jotun Hein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Conserved Critical Evolutionary Gene Structures in Orthologs.

Authors:  Miguel A Fuertes; José R Rodrigo; Carlos Alonso
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Parameters for accurate genome alignment.

Authors:  Martin C Frith; Michiaki Hamada; Paul Horton
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement.

Authors:  Aaron E Darling; Bob Mau; Nicole T Perna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Expanding the computational toolbox for mining cancer genomes.

Authors:  Li Ding; Michael C Wendl; Joshua F McMichael; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Algorithms for hidden markov models restricted to occurrences of regular expressions.

Authors:  Paula Tataru; Andreas Sand; Asger Hobolth; Thomas Mailund; Christian N S Pedersen
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-08

9.  FLYSNPdb: a high-density SNP database of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Doris Chen; Jürg Berger; Michaela Fellner; Takashi Suzuki
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  BigFoot: Bayesian alignment and phylogenetic footprinting with MCMC.

Authors:  Rahul Satija; Adám Novák; István Miklós; Rune Lyngsø; Jotun Hein
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.