OBJECTIVE: This report examines the pain-related pupil dilation response (PDR), tracking it across mixture concentrations of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) in oxygen (O(2)) and relating its variation to change in long latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain report. METHODS: We varied mixture concentrations of N(2)O in O(2) (0%, 10%, 30%, and 50%), measuring PDR, SEP and VAS responses to painful electrical fingertip stimulation at high and low intensities in 15 volunteers. RESULTS: Mixed effect model statistical analyses revealed that: (1) PDR increased significantly with stimulus intensity and constricted significantly with mixture concentration; (2) SEP and VAS decreased significantly with increasing mixture concentration; (3) PDR correlated with SEP amplitude and VAS across mixture concentrations; (4) subjects differed significantly in: (a) baseline PDR and SEP amplitudes, (b) rate of change of these measures across mixture concentrations; and (5) VAS increased significantly with stimulus intensity and decreased significantly with mixture concentration without significant individual differences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the hypothesis that the pain-related PDR is a complex brain-mediated response rather than a simple sympathetic reflex. SIGNIFICANCE: PDR may provide a useful indicator for studying the central processing of noxious stimuli and the effects of analgesic interventions.
OBJECTIVE: This report examines the pain-related pupil dilation response (PDR), tracking it across mixture concentrations of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) in oxygen (O(2)) and relating its variation to change in long latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain report. METHODS: We varied mixture concentrations of N(2)O in O(2) (0%, 10%, 30%, and 50%), measuring PDR, SEP and VAS responses to painful electrical fingertip stimulation at high and low intensities in 15 volunteers. RESULTS: Mixed effect model statistical analyses revealed that: (1) PDR increased significantly with stimulus intensity and constricted significantly with mixture concentration; (2) SEP and VAS decreased significantly with increasing mixture concentration; (3) PDR correlated with SEP amplitude and VAS across mixture concentrations; (4) subjects differed significantly in: (a) baseline PDR and SEP amplitudes, (b) rate of change of these measures across mixture concentrations; and (5) VAS increased significantly with stimulus intensity and decreased significantly with mixture concentration without significant individual differences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the hypothesis that the pain-related PDR is a complex brain-mediated response rather than a simple sympathetic reflex. SIGNIFICANCE: PDR may provide a useful indicator for studying the central processing of noxious stimuli and the effects of analgesic interventions.
Authors: James C Eisenach; Regina Curry; Carol A Aschenbrenner; Robert C Coghill; Timothy T Houle Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Jean Guglielminotti; France Mentré; Johann Gaillard; Mohamed Ghalayini; Philippe Montravers; Dan Longrois Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 5.108