Literature DB >> 1764584

How representative are members of expert panels?

M McKee1, P Priest, M Ginzler, N Black.   

Abstract

A study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that consultants who are willing to participate in expert panels are similar, in terms of routinely available characteristics, to those who are not participating. All consultants in acute specialties in North-east Thames Region were asked to participate in a series of expert panels. Routinely available data was used to compare those who agreed to participate with those who declined or did not reply. Consultants who are willing to participate in expert panels are similar to those who are not in terms of years since qualification, specialty, sex, country of graduation, and possession of higher degrees. Consultants working in district general hospitals seem to be more likely to be willing to participate than those employed in teaching hospitals (37% versus 26%, p less than 0.02), although this difference may be accounted for by errors in the list of teaching hospital consultants.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1764584     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/3.2.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Assur Health Care        ISSN: 1040-6166


  13 in total

1.  Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Quintana; J Cabriada; I López de Tejada; M Varona; V Oribe; B Barrios; I Aróstegui; A Bilbao
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

2.  Multidisciplinary consensus on the terminology and classification of complaints of the arm, neck and/or shoulder.

Authors:  B M A Huisstede; H S Miedema; A P Verhagen; B W Koes; J A N Verhaar
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  International consensus on safe techniques and error definitions in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Esther M Bonrath; Nicolas J Dedy; Boris Zevin; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Consensus procedures and their role in pediatric rheumatology.

Authors:  Nicolino Ruperto; Silvia Meiorin; Silvia Mirela Iusan; Angelo Ravelli; Angela Pistorio; Alberto Martini
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Consensus methods for medical and health services research.

Authors:  J Jones; D Hunter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-05

6.  Impact of guidelines implemented in a paris university hospital: application to the use of antiemetics by cancer patients.

Authors:  I Debrix; A Flahault; A Becker; L Schwartz; A Kanfer; B Milleron
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Appropriate indications for prostatectomy in the UK--results of a consensus panel.

Authors:  D J Hunter; C M McKee; C F Sanderson; N A Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  How to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction and fixation of the wrist and ankle in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  M S Beerekamp; R Haverlag; D T Ubbink; J S Luitse; K J Ponsen; J C Goslings
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  AQUILA: assessment of quality in lower limb arthroplasty. An expert Delphi consensus for total knee and total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Olaf M Dekkers; Saskia Middeldorp; Edward R Valstar; Huub J L van der Heide; Henrica M J Van der Linden-Van der Zwaag; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Consensus standards for the process of cancer care: a modified expert panel method applied to head and neck cancer. South and West Expert Tumour Panel for Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  M A Birchall
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.