Literature DB >> 17645678

Economic evaluation of tegaserod vs. placebo in the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome: an analysis of the TENOR study.

Andrea Bracco1, Bengt Jönsson, Jean-Francois Ricci, Michael Drummond, Henry Nyhlin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Tegaserod is effective, safe, and well-tolerated in the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation. The aim of this study was to assess, from a payer perspective, the cost-effectiveness of tegaserod in the treatment of IBS patients, based on the TEgaserod in NORdic region (TENOR) trial data.
METHODS: Female and male patients (Rome II criteria) were randomized to receive tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 12 weeks. Patients (247 tegaserod; 238 placebo) completed the EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire at baseline, Week 4, and Week 12. A 12-week economic study was undertaken to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of tegaserod in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were calculated to estimate the probability of tegaserod being cost-effective at different benchmark values of cost per QALY gained.
RESULTS: By assuming a daily drug cost to payers of Euro 2, Euro 3, and Euro 4, the ICER of tegaserod ranges between Euro 19,000 and Euro 38,000 per QALY gained, with the percentage of the bootstrap estimates below the willingness to pay level of Euro 50,000 per QALY gained ranging between 90% and 69%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study established directly from a randomized controlled clinical trial that tegaserod is cost-effective in the treatment of non-D-IBS patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17645678     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00179.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of linaclotide compared to antidepressants in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in Scotland.

Authors:  Mark Fisher; Andrew Walker; Meritxell Falqués; Miguel Moya; Mark Rance; Douglas Taylor; Leandro Lindner
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-01-04

2.  Targeted screening for Coeliac Disease among irritable bowel syndrome patients: analysis of cost-effectiveness and value of information.

Authors:  Leyla Mohseninejad; Talitha Feenstra; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Hèlen Woutersen-Koch; Erik Buskens
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-11-18

3.  Change in Quality of Life for Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome following Referral to a Gastroenterologist: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Caroline Canavan; Joe West; Timothy Card
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Economic Evaluation alongside Multinational Studies: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies.

Authors:  Raymond Oppong; Sue Jowett; Tracy E Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effective Constipation Treatment Changes More Than Bowel Frequency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt; David J Levinthal; Salman Nusrat
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-01-31       Impact factor: 4.924

6.  Cost-effectiveness of interventions for medically unexplained symptoms: A systematic review.

Authors:  Margreet S H Wortman; Joran Lokkerbol; Johannes C van der Wouden; Bart Visser; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Tim C Olde Hartman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Efficacy and mode of action of mesalazine in the treatment of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthew P Leighton; Ching Lam; Samir Mehta; Robin C Spiller
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.