Literature DB >> 1764557

Adhesion of Escherichia coli on to a series of poly(methacrylates) differing in charge and hydrophobicity.

G Harkes1, J Feijen, J Dankert.   

Abstract

The adhesion of three Escherichia coli strains on to six poly(methacrylates) differing in hydrophobicity and surface charge was measured as a function of time under laminar flow conditions. Polymers used were poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) and copolymers of MMA or HEMA with either 15% methacrylic acid (MAA) or 15% trimethylaminoethyl methacrylate-HCl salt (TMAEMA-Cl). Bacterial and polymer surfaces were characterized by means of water contact angles and zeta potentials. Both the sessile drop contact angles and the zeta potentials of the bacterial surfaces were significantly different. No significant differences in the sessile drop contact angles of the polymer surfaces were observed. Using the Wilhelmy plate technique large contact angle hysteresis was observed for the different polymer surfaces. Surfaces of copolymers with MAA had more negative zeta potentials than those of the corresponding homopolymers. Surfaces of copolymers with TMAEMA-Cl had positive zeta potentials. The highest numbers of adherent bacteria were found on materials with positive zeta potentials, irrespective of the bacterial strain used. Bacterial adhesion on to copolymers with MAA was less than on to the corresponding homopolymers. Bacterial equilibrium adhesion values correlate with the zeta potentials of the polymer surfaces (r greater than 0.85). On substrates with less negative zeta potentials high numbers of adhered bacteria were observed. Additionally, the equilibrium bacterial adhesion values could be related with receding contact angles of polymer surfaces with negative zeta potentials (r greater than 0.86). High equilibrium adhesion values were obtained for polymers with high contact angles. No correlation between the zeta potentials and contact angles of the bacteria with the adhesion values was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1764557     DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(91)90074-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  11 in total

1.  Bacterial migration along solid surfaces.

Authors:  G Harkes; J Dankert; J Feijen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Shewanella putrefaciens adhesion and biofilm formation on food processing surfaces.

Authors:  D Bagge; M Hjelm; C Johansen; I Huber; L Gram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  HTR polymer facial implants: a five-year clinical experience.

Authors:  B L Eppley; A M Sadove; H Holmstrom; K E Kahnberg
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Arthroscopy in patients with knee endoprostheses.

Authors:  J Jerosch; M Schröder; J Steinbeck; H Halm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Adhesion of the positively charged bacterium Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia 70401 to glass and Teflon.

Authors:  B A Jucker; H Harms; A J Zehnder
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Vibrio fischeri and Escherichia coli adhesion tendencies towards photolithographically modified nanosmooth poly (tert-butyl methacrylate) polymer surfaces.

Authors:  Elena P Ivanova; Natasa Mitik-Dineva; Radu C Mocanasu; Sarah Murphy; James Wang; Grant van Riessen; Russell J Crawford
Journal:  Nanotechnol Sci Appl       Date:  2008-09-19

7.  Antibacterial protection of suture material by chlorhexidine-functionalized polyelectrolyte multilayer films.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Harnet; Erell Le Guen; Vincent Ball; Henri Tenenbaum; Joelle Ogier; Youssef Haikel; Constant Vodouhê
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Initial adhesion and surface growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on negatively and positively charged poly(methacrylates).

Authors:  B Gottenbos; H C Van Der Mei; H J Busscher; D W Grijpma; J Feijen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  An ORMOSIL-containing orthodontic acrylic resin with concomitant improvements in antimicrobial and fracture toughness properties.

Authors:  Shi-qiang Gong; Jeevani Epasinghe; Frederick A Rueggeberg; Li-na Niu; Donald Mettenberg; Cynthia K Y Yiu; John D Blizzard; Christine D Wu; Jing Mao; Connie L Drisko; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Biocompatibility of composite resins.

Authors:  Sayed Mostafa Mousavinasab
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.