Antonio Aversa1, Lelio Mario Sarteschi. 1. Department of Medical Pathophysiology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy. antonio.aversa@uniromal.it
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In the era of orally active agents, dynamic penile color-duplex ultrasound (D-PCDU) is not considered a necessary first screening for all patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Various parameters, such as peak systolic flow velocity, end diastolic velocity, resistance index, acceleration time, and degree of arterial dilatation, have been suggested for the diagnosis of vascular ED by D-PCDU. AIM: To highlight the clinical utility and evidence-based interpretation of D-PCDU criteria. METHODS: Extensive, unsystematic PubMed literature search reviewing relevant data on D-PCDU in the evaluation of male ED. RESULTS: The advantage of ultrasound is the minimally invasive nature of the procedure and the ability to screen patients to identify a normal arterial response of cavernous arteries. Men with sexual dysfunctions above 55 years of age and comorbidities are more likely to have multi-organ vascular dysfunction and may necessitate further testing because erectile failure may be the first presenting symptom requiring investigation and treatment even in the absence of cardiovascular risk factors. All patients affected with Peyronie's disease and younger men with persistent ED, a history of pelvic traumas, or fractures of the penile shaft should be offered ultrasonographic penile blood flow studies before referral to surgery or more invasive vascular investigations. CONCLUSIONS: In the near future, D-PCDU may be used in preference to patients presenting with or without vascular risk factors, particularly those not responding to first-line orally active drugs and seeking an explanation as to why these agents failed.
INTRODUCTION: In the era of orally active agents, dynamic penile color-duplex ultrasound (D-PCDU) is not considered a necessary first screening for all patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Various parameters, such as peak systolic flow velocity, end diastolic velocity, resistance index, acceleration time, and degree of arterial dilatation, have been suggested for the diagnosis of vascular ED by D-PCDU. AIM: To highlight the clinical utility and evidence-based interpretation of D-PCDU criteria. METHODS: Extensive, unsystematic PubMed literature search reviewing relevant data on D-PCDU in the evaluation of male ED. RESULTS: The advantage of ultrasound is the minimally invasive nature of the procedure and the ability to screen patients to identify a normal arterial response of cavernous arteries. Men with sexual dysfunctions above 55 years of age and comorbidities are more likely to have multi-organ vascular dysfunction and may necessitate further testing because erectile failure may be the first presenting symptom requiring investigation and treatment even in the absence of cardiovascular risk factors. All patients affected with Peyronie's disease and younger men with persistent ED, a history of pelvic traumas, or fractures of the penile shaft should be offered ultrasonographic penile blood flow studies before referral to surgery or more invasive vascular investigations. CONCLUSIONS: In the near future, D-PCDU may be used in preference to patients presenting with or without vascular risk factors, particularly those not responding to first-line orally active drugs and seeking an explanation as to why these agents failed.
Authors: G Corona; E Mannucci; A D Fisher; F Lotti; E Bandini; L Vignozzi; G Balercia; F Paggi; L Petrone; G Forti; M Maggi Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Pablo Garrido-Abad; Isabel Senra-Bravo; Celeste Manfredi; Esaú Fernández-Pascual; Estefanía Linares-Espinós; Manuel Fernández-Arjona; David Varillas-Delgado; Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Bruno Nascimento; Eduardo P Miranda; Jean-Etienne Terrier; Felipe Carneiro; John P Mulhall Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 3.937
Authors: J R Kovac; L Gomez; R P Smith; R M Coward; M A Gonzales; M Khera; D J Lamb; L I Lipshultz Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 2.896
Authors: Mohit Butaney; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Mark S Hockenberry; E Will Kirby; Alexander W Pastuszak; Larry I Lipshultz Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 2.896