Literature DB >> 17645017

Scale-dependent variation in coral community similarity across sites, islands, and island groups.

Howard V Cornell1, Ronald H Karlson, Terence P Hughes.   

Abstract

Community similarity is the proportion of species richness in a region that is shared on average among communities within that region. The slope of local richness (alpha diversity) regressed on regional richness (gamma diversity) can serve as an index of community similarity across regions with different regional richness. We examined community similarity in corals at three spatial scales (among transects at a site, sites on an island, and islands within an island group) across a 10 000-km longitudinal diversity gradient in the west-central Pacific Ocean. When alpha diversity was regressed on gamma diversity, the slopes, and thus community similarity, increased with scale (0.085, 0.261, and 0.407, respectively) because a greater proportion of gamma diversity was subsumed within alpha diversity as scale increased. Using standard randomization methods, we also examined how community similarity differed between observed and randomized assemblages and how this difference was affected by spatial separation of species within habitat types and specialization of species to three habitat types (reef flats, crests, and slopes). If spatial separation within habitat types and/or habitat specialization (i.e., underdispersion) occurs, fewer species are shared among assemblages than the random expectation. When the locations of individual coral colonies were randomized within and among habitat types, community similarity was 46-47% higher than that for observed assemblages at all three scales. We predicted that spatial separation of coral species within habitat types should increase with scale due to dispersal/extinction dynamics in this insular system, but that specialization of species to different habitat types should not change because habitat differences do not change with scale. However, neither habitat specialization nor spatial separation within habitat types differed among scales. At the two larger scales, each accounted for 22-24% of the difference in community similarity between observed and randomized assemblages. At the smallest scale (transect-site), neither spatial separation within habitat types nor habitat specialization had significant effects on community similarity, probably due to the small size of transect samples. The results suggest that coral species can disperse among islands in an island group as easily as they can among sites on an island over time scales that are relevant to their establishment and persistence on reefs.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17645017     DOI: 10.1890/06-0742.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  4 in total

1.  Detecting density dependence in recovering seal populations.

Authors:  Carl Johan Svensson; Anders Eriksson; Tero Harkonen; Karin C Harding
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 2.  Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales.

Authors:  Jonathan M Chase; Jonathan A Myers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A general framework for the distance-decay of similarity in ecological communities.

Authors:  Hélène Morlon; George Chuyong; Richard Condit; Stephen Hubbell; David Kenfack; Duncan Thomas; Renato Valencia; Jessica L Green
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Local and regional effects on community structure of dung beetles in a mainland-island scenario.

Authors:  Pedro Giovâni da Silva; Malva Isabel Medina Hernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.