Christine Eiser1. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. c.eiser@sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To discuss (a) the impact of late physical and psychological effects on quality of life (QOL) among survivors of childhood cancer, (b) the rationale for providing follow-up care, and (c) potential value for survivors. METHODS: Research related to four areas was summarized: (a) the late physical and psychological effects experienced by survivors and possible impact on health-related QOL, (b) assessment of QOL, (c) rationale for offering follow-up, and (d) assessment of its value to survivors. RESULTS: Evaluation of follow-up can include identification and treatment of second cancers, but these are rarely identified in clinic. Evaluation, therefore, needs to emphasize value for survivors and can include improved QOL, disease information, screening attendance, and lifestyle behaviors especially smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-disciplinary models of follow-up are required to address the range of effects identified after childhood cancer. Systematic assessment of QOL should be an integral part of follow-up in order to facilitate communication and broaden the scope of the consultation.
OBJECTIVES: To discuss (a) the impact of late physical and psychological effects on quality of life (QOL) among survivors of childhood cancer, (b) the rationale for providing follow-up care, and (c) potential value for survivors. METHODS: Research related to four areas was summarized: (a) the late physical and psychological effects experienced by survivors and possible impact on health-related QOL, (b) assessment of QOL, (c) rationale for offering follow-up, and (d) assessment of its value to survivors. RESULTS: Evaluation of follow-up can include identification and treatment of second cancers, but these are rarely identified in clinic. Evaluation, therefore, needs to emphasize value for survivors and can include improved QOL, disease information, screening attendance, and lifestyle behaviors especially smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-disciplinary models of follow-up are required to address the range of effects identified after childhood cancer. Systematic assessment of QOL should be an integral part of follow-up in order to facilitate communication and broaden the scope of the consultation.
Authors: Samantha J Anthony; Enid Selkirk; Lillian Sung; Robert J Klaassen; David Dix; Katrin Scheinemann; Anne F Klassen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Taghrid Asfar; Robert C Klesges; Stacy D Sanford; Deborah Sherrill-Mittleman; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Grant Somes; James M Boyett; Harry Lando Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Raheem J Paxton; Lee W Jones; Philip M Rosoff; Melanie Bonner; Joann L Ater; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Patricia A Parker; Smita C Banerjee; Matthew J Matasar; Carma L Bylund; Madeline Rogers; Kara Franco; Elizabeth Schofield; Yuelin Li; Tomer T Levin; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Astrow; Howard Leventhal; Steven Horwitz; David Kissane Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Eva-Lena Einberg; Ibadete Kadrija; David Brunt; Jens N Nygren; Petra Svedberg Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 3.186