Literature DB >> 17644273

Modifying the object-choice task: is the way you look important for ravens?

Christian Schloegl1, Kurt Kotrschal, Thomas Bugnyar.   

Abstract

Most animals seem to have difficulties in using gaze cues to find hidden food in object-choice tasks. For instance, chimpanzees usually fail in these tests, even though they are capable of following other's gaze geometrically behind barriers. Similar to chimpanzees, common ravens are skilled in tracking other's gaze but fail in object-choice tasks. We here explored whether procedural modifications, which had been used successfully in chimpanzees, would also yield positive results in ravens. In our modifications (a) the experimenter approached the cup while gazing at it, (b) the gaze cue was accompanied by a sound and (c) the experimenter could actually see the food while giving the gaze cue. Two out of seven birds performed above chance level in some of these conditions. However, we ascribe this improvement to the individuals' learning ability rather than to an understanding of the communicative nature of the task. This interpretation is further supported by results of a follow-up experiment suggesting that ravens may not rely on conspecifics' gaze cues for finding food caches in a natural foraging context. In sum, our results suggest that ravens may not transfer their gaze follow abilities to foraging situations involving hidden food.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17644273     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  8 in total

Review 1.  Social cognition and the evolution of language: constructing cognitive phylogenies.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Ludwig Huber; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  New perspectives in gaze sensitivity research.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Using cross correlations to investigate how chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) use conspecific gaze cues to extract and exploit information in a foraging competition.

Authors:  Katie Hall; Mike W Oram; Matthew W Campbell; Timothy M Eppley; Richard W Byrne; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  A comparative view of face perception.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Short-term observational spatial memory in Jackdaws (Corvus monedula) and Ravens (Corvus corax).

Authors:  Christelle Scheid; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Do owners have a clever hans effect on dogs? Results of a pointing study.

Authors:  Teresa Schmidjell; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber; Zsófia Virányi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-26

7.  Gaze direction - a cue for hidden food in rooks (Corvus frugilegus)?

Authors:  Judith Schmidt; Christelle Scheid; Kurt Kotrschal; Thomas Bugnyar; Christian Schloegl
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  What you see is what you get? Exclusion performances in ravens and keas.

Authors:  Christian Schloegl; Anneke Dierks; Gyula K Gajdon; Ludwig Huber; Kurt Kotrschal; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.