Literature DB >> 17644149

16S rRNA-based assays for quantitative detection of universal, human-, cow-, and dog-specific fecal Bacteroidales: a Bayesian approach.

Beverly J Kildare1, Christian M Leutenegger, Belinda S McSwain, Dustin G Bambic, Veronica B Rajal, Stefan Wuertz.   

Abstract

We report the design and validation of new TaqMan((R)) assays for microbial source tracking based on the amplification of fecal 16S rRNA marker sequences from uncultured cells of the order Bacteroidales. The assays were developed for the detection and enumeration of non-point source input of fecal pollution to watersheds. The quantitative "universal"Bacteroidales assay BacUni-UCD detected all tested stool samples from human volunteers (18 out of 18), cat (7 out of 7), dog (8 out of 8), seagull (10/10), cow (8/8), horse (8/8), and wastewater effluent (14/14). The human assay BacHum-UCD discriminated fully between human and cow stool samples but did not detect all stool samples from human volunteers (12/18). In addition, there was 12.5% detection of dog stool (1/8), but no cross-reactivity with cat, horse, or seagull fecal samples. In contrast, all wastewater samples were positive for the BacHum-UCD marker, supporting its designation as 100% sensitive for mixed-human source identification. The cow-specific assay BacCow-UCD fully discriminated between cow and human stool samples. There was 38% detection of horse stool (3/8), but no cross-specificity with any of the other animal stool samples tested. The dog assay BacCan-UCD discriminated fully between dog and cow stool or seagull guano samples and detected 62.5% stool samples from dogs (5/8). There was some cross-reactivity with 22.2% detection of human stool (4/18), 14.3% detection of cat stool (1/7), and 28.6% detection of wastewater samples (4/14). After validation using stool samples, single-blind tests were used to further demonstrate the efficacy of the developed markers; all assays were sensitive, reproducible, and accurate in the quantification of mixed fecal sources present in aqueous samples. Finally, the new assays were compared with previously published sequences, which showed the new methodologies to be more specific and sensitive. Using Bayes' Theorem, we calculated the conditional probability that the four assays would correctly identify general and host-specific fecal pollution in a specific watershed in California for which 73 water samples had been analyzed. Such an approach allows for a direct comparison of the efficacy of different MST methods, including those based on library-dependent methodologies. For the universal marker BacUni-UCD, the probability that fecal pollution is present when the marker is detected was 1.00; the probability that host-specific pollution is present was 0.98, 0.84, and 0.89 for the human assay HF160F, the cow assay BacCow-UCD, and the dog assay BacCan-UCD, respectively. The application of these markers should provide meaningful information to assist with efforts to identify and control sources of fecal pollution to impaired watersheds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17644149     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  110 in total

1.  Highly discriminatory single-nucleotide polymorphism interrogation of Escherichia coli by use of allele-specific real-time PCR and eBURST analysis.

Authors:  Maxim S Sheludchenko; Flavia Huygens; Megan H Hargreaves
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evaluation of conventional and alternative monitoring methods for a recreational marine beach with nonpoint source of fecal contamination.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Shibata; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Christopher D Sinigalliano; Maribeth L Gidley; Lisa R W Plano; Jay M Fleisher; John D Wang; Samir M Elmir; Guoqing He; Mary E Wright; Amir M Abdelzaher; Cristina Ortega; David Wanless; Anna C Garza; Jonathan Kish; Troy Scott; Julie Hollenbeck; Lorraine C Backer; Lora E Fleming
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Blautia and Prevotella sequences distinguish human and animal fecal pollution in Brazil surface waters.

Authors:  Amber M Koskey; Jenny C Fisher; A Murat Eren; Rafael Ponce-Terashima; Mitermayer G Reis; Ronald E Blanton; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.541

4.  Correlation of quantitative PCR for a poultry-specific brevibacterium marker gene with bacterial and chemical indicators of water pollution in a watershed impacted by land application of poultry litter.

Authors:  Jennifer L Weidhaas; Tamzen W Macbeth; Roger L Olsen; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Distribution of genetic marker concentrations for fecal indicator bacteria in sewage and animal feces.

Authors:  Catherine A Kelty; Manju Varma; Mano Sivaganesan; Richard A Haugland; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Unsuitability of quantitative Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene assays for discerning fecal contamination of drinking water.

Authors:  Paul W J J van der Wielen; Gertjan Medema
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Traditional and molecular analyses for fecal indicator bacteria in non-point source subtropical recreational marine waters.

Authors:  Christopher D Sinigalliano; Jay M Fleisher; Maribeth L Gidley; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Tomoyuki Shibata; Lisa R W Plano; Samir M Elmir; David Wanless; Jakub Bartkowiak; Rene Boiteau; Kelly Withum; Amir M Abdelzaher; Guoqing He; Cristina Ortega; Xiaofang Zhu; Mary E Wright; Jonathan Kish; Julie Hollenbeck; Troy Scott; Lorraine C Backer; Lora E Fleming
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Association of fecal indicator bacteria with human viruses and microbial source tracking markers at coastal beaches impacted by nonpoint source pollution.

Authors:  Shannon McQuaig; John Griffith; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Viral and Bacterial Fecal Indicators in Untreated Wastewater across the Contiguous United States Exhibit Geospatial Trends.

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Brian McMinn; Michael P Herrmann; Mano Sivaganesan; Catherine A Kelty; Pat Clinton; Maliha S Nash; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Human-Associated Lachnospiraceae Genetic Markers Improve Detection of Fecal Pollution Sources in Urban Waters.

Authors:  Shuchen Feng; Melinda Bootsma; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.