BACKGROUND: Optimal inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) may afford greater protection against ischemic events during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The objective of this study was to test several antiplatelet regimens in elective high-risk PCI patients by comparing different combinations of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and clopidogrel. METHODS: The study was a randomized open-label study at 3 heart centers in India. One hundred twenty patients were enrolled between July 2006 and September 2006. Patients were randomized to 1 of the 4 groups: group A--tirofiban, group B--eptifibatide, group C--tirofiban + clopidogrel 600-mg loading dose, and group D--eptifibatide + clopidogrel 600-mg loading dose. All patients received a clopidogrel maintenance dose after PCI. The primary outcome measure was the IPA assessed at 10 minutes, at 6 to 8 hours, and at 24 hours. RESULTS: The IPA was higher with high-dose tirofiban compared with eptifibatide at 10 minutes (95.88 +/- 5.85% vs 91.22 +/- 7.52%, P = .003) and at 6 to 8 hours (93.11 +/- 7.6% vs 85.45 +/- 11.03, P < .001). Significantly more patients achieved >95% IPA with the high-dose tirofiban regimen. CONCLUSIONS: This head-to-head study comparing high-dose tirofiban with double-bolus eptifibatide demonstrated higher degree of platelet inhibition with high-dose tirofiban at 10 minutes and at 6 to 8 hours in patients undergoing elective high-risk PCI. The addition of clopidogrel did not acutely extend the IPA from intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but did so at 24 hours.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Optimal inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) may afford greater protection against ischemic events during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The objective of this study was to test several antiplatelet regimens in elective high-risk PCI patients by comparing different combinations of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and clopidogrel. METHODS: The study was a randomized open-label study at 3 heart centers in India. One hundred twenty patients were enrolled between July 2006 and September 2006. Patients were randomized to 1 of the 4 groups: group A--tirofiban, group B--eptifibatide, group C--tirofiban + clopidogrel 600-mg loading dose, and group D--eptifibatide + clopidogrel 600-mg loading dose. All patients received a clopidogrel maintenance dose after PCI. The primary outcome measure was the IPA assessed at 10 minutes, at 6 to 8 hours, and at 24 hours. RESULTS: The IPA was higher with high-dose tirofiban compared with eptifibatide at 10 minutes (95.88 +/- 5.85% vs 91.22 +/- 7.52%, P = .003) and at 6 to 8 hours (93.11 +/- 7.6% vs 85.45 +/- 11.03, P < .001). Significantly more patients achieved >95% IPA with the high-dose tirofiban regimen. CONCLUSIONS: This head-to-head study comparing high-dose tirofiban with double-bolus eptifibatide demonstrated higher degree of platelet inhibition with high-dose tirofiban at 10 minutes and at 6 to 8 hours in patients undergoing elective high-risk PCI. The addition of clopidogrel did not acutely extend the IPA from intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but did so at 24 hours.
Authors: William B Hillegass; Brigitta C Brott; James C Dobbs; Silvio E Papapietro; Vijay K Misra; Gilbert J Zoghbi Journal: Vasc Health Risk Manag Date: 2011-07-18