OBJECTIVE: Labial cervical vertical groove (LCVG), a dental anomaly found at the cervical region of upper permanent incisors, can be of esthetic, periodontal and prosthetic concern. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence and characteristics of LCVG. DESIGN: Of the 1250 examined subjects, 66 exhibited an LCVG. This group (age 19.7+/-11.4 years) was then compared with a matched No-LCVG (control) group of 49 subjects (age 17.9+/-5.7 years). Six LCVG characteristics were examined: distribution, severity and location of LCVG in central (I(1)) and lateral (I(2)) permanent maxillary incisors, Angle's classification, gender and presence of LCVG in siblings. RESULTS: Total LCVG prevalence was 5.3% (single 3.76%; multiple 1.53%), found predominantly in I(1) (93.9%) compared with I(2) (p=0.001). The anomaly presented mostly as a single configuration (71.21%); double configuration was predominantly homological bilateral, i.e., I(1)+I(1), or I(2)+I(2) (88%). LCVG in I(2) was mainly associated with multi-configuration (75%). The severe form occurred only in I(1). A mid-crown LCVG allocation was distinctive in I(1) (62.2%, p=0.001) and mesial-crown in I(2) (66.7%, p=0.038). LCVG was found mostly in males (p=0.045). In the LCVG group 16.7% were siblings. CONCLUSIONS: LCVG primarily involved I(1) in single configuration as the target assaulted tooth and secondarily I(2) mostly as a multi-configuration. The genetic impact on LCVG formation was primarily supported by the high prevalence in siblings and secondarily by the favourable occurrence in males, exclusive pattern of allocation within the crown and high occurrence of bilateral double-configuration LCVG.
OBJECTIVE: Labial cervical vertical groove (LCVG), a dental anomaly found at the cervical region of upper permanent incisors, can be of esthetic, periodontal and prosthetic concern. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence and characteristics of LCVG. DESIGN: Of the 1250 examined subjects, 66 exhibited an LCVG. This group (age 19.7+/-11.4 years) was then compared with a matched No-LCVG (control) group of 49 subjects (age 17.9+/-5.7 years). Six LCVG characteristics were examined: distribution, severity and location of LCVG in central (I(1)) and lateral (I(2)) permanent maxillary incisors, Angle's classification, gender and presence of LCVG in siblings. RESULTS: Total LCVG prevalence was 5.3% (single 3.76%; multiple 1.53%), found predominantly in I(1) (93.9%) compared with I(2) (p=0.001). The anomaly presented mostly as a single configuration (71.21%); double configuration was predominantly homological bilateral, i.e., I(1)+I(1), or I(2)+I(2) (88%). LCVG in I(2) was mainly associated with multi-configuration (75%). The severe form occurred only in I(1). A mid-crown LCVG allocation was distinctive in I(1) (62.2%, p=0.001) and mesial-crown in I(2) (66.7%, p=0.038). LCVG was found mostly in males (p=0.045). In the LCVG group 16.7% were siblings. CONCLUSIONS: LCVG primarily involved I(1) in single configuration as the target assaulted tooth and secondarily I(2) mostly as a multi-configuration. The genetic impact on LCVG formation was primarily supported by the high prevalence in siblings and secondarily by the favourable occurrence in males, exclusive pattern of allocation within the crown and high occurrence of bilateral double-configuration LCVG.
Authors: Giovanna Laura Di Domenico; Simone Fabrizi; Paolo Capparè; Maria Teresa Sberna; Massimo de Sanctis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.390