Literature DB >> 17643342

The chlorophenoxy herbicide dicamba and its commercial formulation banvel induce genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.

Norma V González1, Sonia Soloneski, Marcelo L Larramendy.   

Abstract

The sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequency, the cell-cycle progression analysis, and the single cell gel electrophoresis technique (SCGE, comet assay) were employed as genetic end-points to investigate the geno- and citotoxicity exerted by dicamba and one of its commercial formulation banvel (dicamba 57.71%) on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Log-phase cells were treated with 1.0-500.0 microg/ml of the herbicides and harvested 24 h later for SCE and cell-cycle progression analyses. All concentrations assessed of both test compounds induced higher SCE frequencies over control values. SCEs increased in a non-dose-dependent manner neither for the pure compound (r=0.48; P>0.05) nor for the commercial formulation (r=0.58, P>0.05). For the 200.0 microg/ml and 500.0 microg/ml dicamba doses and the 500.0 microg/ml banvel dose, a significant delay in the cell-cycle progression was found. A regression test showed that the proliferation rate index decreased as a function of either the concentration of dicamba (r=-0.98, P<0.05) or banvel (r=-0.88, P<0.01) titrated into cultures in the 1.0-500.0 microg/ml dose-range. SCGE performed on CHO cells after a 90 min pulse-treatment of dicamba and banvel within a 50.0-500.0 microg/ml dose-range revealed a clear increase in dicamba-induced DNA damage as an enhancement of the proportion of slightly damaged and damaged cells for all concentrations used (P<0.01); concomitantly, a decrease of undamaged cells was found over control values (P<0.01). In banvel-treated cells, a similar overall result was registered. Dicamba induced a significant increase both in comet length and width over control values (P<0.01) regardless of its concentration whereas banvel induced the same effect only within 100.0-500.0 microg/ml dose range (P<0.01). As detected by three highly sensitive bioassays, the present results clearly showed the capability of dicamba and banvel to induce DNA and cellular damage on CHO cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17643342     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  5 in total

1.  Dicamba use and cancer incidence in the agricultural health study: an updated analysis.

Authors:  Catherine C Lerro; Jonathan N Hofmann; Gabriella Andreotti; Stella Koutros; Christine G Parks; Aaron Blair; Paul S Albert; Jay H Lubin; Dale P Sandler; Laura E Beane Freeman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Pesticide risk indicators: unidentified inert ingredients compromise their integrity and utility.

Authors:  Michael Surgan; Madison Condon; Caroline Cox
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Impact of EMS outreach: successful developments in Latin America.

Authors:  Ofelia A Olivero; Marcelo Larramendy; Sonia Soloneski; Carlos F M Menck; Jaime Matta; Gustavo A Folle; Enrique Zamorano-Ponce; Graciela Spivak
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  In vitro genotoxicity assessment of the synthetic plant growth regulator, 1-naphthaleneacetamide.

Authors:  Ayşe Yavuz Kocaman; Banu Güven
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Occupational Exposure to Pesticides and the Incidence of Lung Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study.

Authors:  Matthew R Bonner; Laura E Beane Freeman; Jane A Hoppin; Stella Koutros; Dale P Sandler; Charles F Lynch; Cynthia J Hines; Kent Thomas; Aaron Blair; Michael C R Alavanja
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.