OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the significance of preoperative clinicopathological factors, including serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), as well as postoperative clinicopathological factors in T1-2N1M0 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent curative pulmonary resection. METHODS: Twenty T1N1M0 disease patients and 25 T2N1M0 patients underwent standard surgical procedures between September 1996 and December 2005, and were found to have non-small lung cancer. As prognostic factors, we retrospectively investigated age, sex, Brinkman index, histologic type, primary site, tumor diameter, clinical T factor, clinical N factor, pathological T factor, preoperative serum CEA levels, surgical procedure, visceral pleural involvement, and the status of lymph node involvement (level and number). RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate of all patients was 59.6%. In univariate analysis, survival was related to age (<70/>or=70 years, p=0.0079), site (peripheral/central, p=0.043), and CEA level (<5.0/>or=5.0 ng/ml, p=0.0015). However, in multivariate analysis, CEA (<5.0/>or=5.0 ng/ml) was the only independent prognostic factor; the 5-year survival of the patients with an elevated serum CEA level (>or=5.0 ng/ml) was only 33.2% compared to 79.9% in patients with a lower serum CEA level (<5.0 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: An elevated serum CEA level (>or=5.0 ng/ml) was an independent predictor of survival in pN1 patients except for T3 and T4 cases. Therefore, even in completely resected pN1 non-small cell lung cancer, patients with a high CEA level might be candidates for multimodal therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the significance of preoperative clinicopathological factors, including serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), as well as postoperative clinicopathological factors in T1-2N1M0 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent curative pulmonary resection. METHODS: Twenty T1N1M0 disease patients and 25 T2N1M0 patients underwent standard surgical procedures between September 1996 and December 2005, and were found to have non-small lung cancer. As prognostic factors, we retrospectively investigated age, sex, Brinkman index, histologic type, primary site, tumor diameter, clinical T factor, clinical N factor, pathological T factor, preoperative serum CEA levels, surgical procedure, visceral pleural involvement, and the status of lymph node involvement (level and number). RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate of all patients was 59.6%. In univariate analysis, survival was related to age (<70/>or=70 years, p=0.0079), site (peripheral/central, p=0.043), and CEA level (<5.0/>or=5.0 ng/ml, p=0.0015). However, in multivariate analysis, CEA (<5.0/>or=5.0 ng/ml) was the only independent prognostic factor; the 5-year survival of the patients with an elevated serum CEA level (>or=5.0 ng/ml) was only 33.2% compared to 79.9% in patients with a lower serum CEA level (<5.0 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: An elevated serum CEA level (>or=5.0 ng/ml) was an independent predictor of survival in pN1patients except for T3 and T4 cases. Therefore, even in completely resected pN1non-small cell lung cancer, patients with a high CEA level might be candidates for multimodal therapy.