Jean-Pierre Farmer1, Abdulrahman J Sabbagh. 1. The Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Room C-811, 2300 Tupper Street, Montreal, QC, H3H 1P3, Canada. Jean-pierre.farmer@mcgill.ca
Abstract
RATIONALE: Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a surgical technique developed over the past decades to manage patients diagnosed with cerebral palsy suffering from spastic diplegia. It involves selectively lesioning sensory rootlets in an effort to maintain a balance between elimination of spasticity and preservation of function. Several recent long-term outcome studies have been published. In addition, shorter follow-up randomized controlled studies have compared the outcome of patients having undergone physiotherapy alone with those that received physiotherapy after selective dorsal rhizotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this account, we will discuss the rationale and outcome after SDR. The outcome is addressed in terms of the gross motor function measurement scale (GMFM), degree of elimination of spasticity, strength enhancement, range of motion, fine motor skills, activity of daily living, spastic hip, necessity for postoperative orthopedic procedures, bladder and sphincteric function, and finally possible early or late complications associated with the procedure. CONCLUSION: We conclude that SDR is a safe procedure, which offers durable and significant functional gains to properly selected children with spasticity related to cerebral palsy.
RATIONALE: Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a surgical technique developed over the past decades to manage patients diagnosed with cerebral palsy suffering from spastic diplegia. It involves selectively lesioning sensory rootlets in an effort to maintain a balance between elimination of spasticity and preservation of function. Several recent long-term outcome studies have been published. In addition, shorter follow-up randomized controlled studies have compared the outcome of patients having undergone physiotherapy alone with those that received physiotherapy after selective dorsal rhizotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this account, we will discuss the rationale and outcome after SDR. The outcome is addressed in terms of the gross motor function measurement scale (GMFM), degree of elimination of spasticity, strength enhancement, range of motion, fine motor skills, activity of daily living, spastic hip, necessity for postoperative orthopedic procedures, bladder and sphincteric function, and finally possible early or late complications associated with the procedure. CONCLUSION: We conclude that SDR is a safe procedure, which offers durable and significant functional gains to properly selected children with spasticity related to cerebral palsy.
Authors: J F McLaughlin; K F Bjornson; S J Astley; R M Hays; S A Hoffinger; E A Armantrout; T S Roberts Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: T S Park; G P Vogler; L H Phillips; B A Kaufman; M R Ortman; S M McClure; P E Gaffney Journal: Pediatr Neurosurg Date: 1994 Impact factor: 1.162
Authors: Nelleke G Langerak; Christopher L Vaughan; Edward B Hoffman; Anthony A Figaji; A Graham Fieggen; Jonathan C Peter Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Georges F Vles; Johan S Vles; Maarten van Kleef; Jan van Zundert; Heleen M Staal; Wim E Weber; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Dan Soudant; H Kerr Graham; Anton J de Louw Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Matthew Wheelwright; Paige J Selvey; Paul Steinbok; Ash Singhal; George Ibrahim; Aria Fallah; Alexander G Weil; Kyle Halvorson; Albert Tu Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 1.475