Literature DB >> 17643123

Architecture of the Dam1 kinetochore ring complex and implications for microtubule-driven assembly and force-coupling mechanisms.

Hong-Wei Wang1, Vincent H Ramey, Stefan Westermann, Andres E Leschziner, Julie P I Welburn, Yuko Nakajima, David G Drubin, Georjana Barnes, Eva Nogales.   

Abstract

The Dam1 kinetochore complex is essential for chromosome segregation in budding yeast. This ten-protein complex self-assembles around microtubules, forming ring-like structures that move with depolymerizing microtubule ends, a mechanism with implications for cellular function. Here we used EM-based single-particle and helical analyses to define the architecture of the Dam1 complex at 30-A resolution and the self-assembly mechanism. Ring oligomerization seems to be facilitated by a conformational change upon binding to microtubules, suggesting that the Dam1 ring is not preformed, but self-assembles around kinetochore microtubules. The C terminus of the Dam1p protein, where most of the Aurora kinase Ipl1 phosphorylation sites reside, is in a strategic location to affect oligomerization and interactions with the microtubule. One of Ipl1's roles might be to fine-tune the coupling of the microtubule interaction with the conformational change required for oligomerization, with phosphorylation resulting in ring breakdown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17643123     DOI: 10.1038/nsmb1274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol        ISSN: 1545-9985            Impact factor:   15.369


  55 in total

1.  Force transduction by the microtubule-bound Dam1 ring.

Authors:  Jonathan W Armond; Matthew S Turner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Tubulin depolymerization may be an ancient biological motor.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Vladimir Volkov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov; Ekaterina L Grishchuk
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  In search of an optimal ring to couple microtubule depolymerization to processive chromosome motions.

Authors:  Artem Efremov; Ekaterina L Grishchuk; J Richard McIntosh; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 6.  Bi-orienting chromosomes: acrobatics on the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore.

Authors:  Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Differentiating the roles of microtubule-associated proteins at meiotic kinetochores during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Yasutaka Kakui; Masamitsu Sato
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Structure of the DASH/Dam1 complex shows its role at the yeast kinetochore-microtubule interface.

Authors:  Simon Jenni; Stephen C Harrison
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Assembling the protein architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore-microtubule attachment using FRET.

Authors:  Pavithra Aravamudhan; Isabella Felzer-Kim; Kaushik Gurunathan; Ajit P Joglekar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.