Literature DB >> 17642587

Sample size and power analysis in medical research.

S P Zodpey1.   

Abstract

Among the questions that a researcher should ask when planning a study is "How large a sample do I need?" If the sample size is too small, even a well conducted study may fail to answer its research question, may fail to detect important effects or associations, or may estimate those effects or associations too imprecisely. Similarly, if the sample size is too large, the study will be more difficult and costly, and may even lead to a loss in accuracy. Hence, optimum sample size is an essential component of any research. When the estimated sample size can not be included in a study, post-hoc power analysis should be carried out. Approaches for estimating sample size and performing power analysis depend primarily on the study design and the main outcome measure of the study. There are distinct approaches for calculating sample size for different study designs and different outcome measures. Additionally, there are also different procedures for calculating sample size for two approaches of drawing statistical inference from the study results, i.e. confidence interval approach and test of significance approach. This article describes some commonly used terms, which need to be specified for a formal sample size calculation. Examples for four procedures (use of formulae, readymade tables, nomograms, and computer software), which are conventionally used for calculating sample size, are also given.

Year:  2004        PMID: 17642587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol        ISSN: 0378-6323            Impact factor:   2.545


  8 in total

1.  Native non-prototypicality in vowel perception induces prominent neuromagnetic mismatch intensities in non-native speakers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mikio Kubota; Junko Matsuzaki; Ippeita Dan; Haruka Dan; George Zouridakis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Protocol Writing in Clinical Research.

Authors:  Azzam Al-Jundi; Salah Sakka
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

3.  Self-Management Training in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Improves the Quality of Life.

Authors:  Hina Vaish
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2021-07

4.  When calculation of minimum sample size is not justified: When sample size calculation is not justified.

Authors:  Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Ahmad Reza Baghestani
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.660

Review 5.  Sample size calculation: Basic principles.

Authors:  Sabyasachi Das; Koel Mitra; Mohanchandra Mandal
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-09

6.  Family planning knowledge and practice among people living with HIV in Nepal.

Authors:  Shiva Raj Mishra; Mahesh Prasad Joshi; Vishnu Khanal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sample size calculation in medical studies.

Authors:  Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Mohsen Vahedi; Mitra Rahimzadeh
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2013

Review 8.  Analyzing the Genotoxicity of Retroviral Vectors in Hematopoietic Cell Gene Therapy.

Authors:  Luca Biasco; Michael Rothe; Hildegard Büning; Axel Schambach
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 6.698

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.