Chantima Porksakorn1, Surang Nuchprayoon, Kiwon Park, Alan L Scott. 1. Lymphatic Filariasis Research Unit, Department of Parasitology, and Chulalongkorn Medical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Abstract
Wolbachia, an endosymbiotic bacterium found in most species of filarial parasites, is thought to play a significant role in inducing innate inflammatory responses in lymphatic filariasis patients. However, the Wolbachia-derived molecules that are recognized by the innate immune system have not yet been identified. In this study, we exposed the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 to a recombinant form of the major Wolbachia surface protein (rWSP) to determine if WSP is capable of innately inducing cytokine transcription. Interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) mRNAs were all upregulated by the rWSP stimulation in a dose-dependant manner. TNF transcription peaked at 3 hours, whereas IL-1beta and IL-6 transcription peaked at 6 hours post-rWSP exposure. The levels of innate cytokine expression induced by a high-dose (9.0 microg/mL) rWSP in the RAW 264.7 cells were comparable to the levels induced by 0.1 microg/mL E. coli-derived lipopolysaccharides. Pretreatment of the rWSP with proteinase-K drastically reduced IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF transcription. However, the proinflammatory response was not inhibited by polymyxin B treatment. These results strongly suggest that the major Wolbachia surface protein molecule WSP is an important inducer of innate immune responses during filarial infections.
Wolbachia, an endosymbiotic bacterium found in most species of filarial parasites, is thought to play a significant role in inducing innate inflammatory responses in lymphatic filariasispatients. However, the Wolbachia-derived molecules that are recognized by the innate immune system have not yet been identified. In this study, we exposed the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 to a recombinant form of the major Wolbachia surface protein (rWSP) to determine if WSP is capable of innately inducing cytokine transcription. Interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) mRNAs were all upregulated by the rWSP stimulation in a dose-dependant manner. TNF transcription peaked at 3 hours, whereas IL-1beta and IL-6 transcription peaked at 6 hours post-rWSP exposure. The levels of innate cytokine expression induced by a high-dose (9.0 microg/mL) rWSP in the RAW 264.7 cells were comparable to the levels induced by 0.1 microg/mL E. coli-derived lipopolysaccharides. Pretreatment of the rWSP with proteinase-K drastically reduced IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF transcription. However, the proinflammatory response was not inhibited by polymyxin B treatment. These results strongly suggest that the major Wolbachia surface protein molecule WSP is an important inducer of innate immune responses during filarial infections.
Lymphatic filariasis remains a major
debilitating and disfiguring disease that affects approximately 120
million people worldwide [1].
Wuchereria bancrofti
is the major filarial species in most endemic areas, including
Thailand [2-7]. The remaining cases of lymphatic
filariasis are caused by Brugia malayi and
B. timori. Host immune responses are thought to be a major factor
contributing to disease progression in lymphatic filariasis, which
manifests as either acute or chronic inflammation
[8-10]. The adverse reactions associated with chemotherapeutic treatment
are also thought to be due to inflammatory responses directly
induced by molecules liberated from drug-damaged microfilariae
[1, 11].
The drug-induced adverse reactions are associated
with the increased post-treatment concentrations of
proinflammatory cytokines and immune modulators, including tumor
necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10,
lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), and soluble TNF
receptors (sTNF-Rs) [12-14]. Although it is believed that
innate immune responses play a major role in this immune-mediated
pathology, the nature of the parasite-derived molecules that
mediate this pathogenesis has not been defined.A majority of filarial nematode species harbor an endosymbiotic
bacterium from the genus Wolbachia. The results of genome
sequence analysis
[15, 16]
and studies where the bacterium is
cleared with antibacterial treatment suggests that the
Wolbachia and the worm have established a mutualistic
relationship in which Wolbachia appears to make major
contributions to the developmental and reproductive biology of the
nematode host [17, 18].
In addition, the Wolbachia
from various filarial parasites have been implicated in the
immunopathogenesis of filarial diseases
[19-21]. In patients infected with B. malayi, the presence of
Wolbachia following DEC treatment of parasites is
strongly associated with severe systemic inflammatory reactions
[22]. Initial studies to identify the molecular basis for
bacteria-mediated inflammation suggested that
Wolbachia-derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS) played a major
role in inducing inflammatory responses [23].
However, a role for
an LPS is unlikely since the Wolbachia genome does not
contain the genes encoding for the enzymes required for the
biosynthesis of LPS [15]. Therefore, other
Wolbachia-derived molecules are responsible for LPS-like
activity in worm extracts and these molecules might be important
for the induction of adverse reactions associated with parasite
death.The purified recombinant form of the Wolbachia surface
protein (rWSP) from Wolbachia of the dog heartworm
Dirofilaria immitis elicits the secretion of IL-1β,
IL-6, IL-8, and TNF from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)
of healthy people [24]. However, roles of WSP from
Wolbachia from the human pathogen B. malayi in
activating the innate immune system have not been characterized.
The B. malayi Wolbachia WSP, a major component
of the proteome [25], shares conserved regions with that of
Wolbachia from other filarial parasites, and with outer
membrane proteins of the closely related bacteria. In this study,
we report that a recombinant form of the WSP from the
B. malayi
Wolbachia is a potent elicitor of the
transcription of proinflammatory cytokines in murine macrophage
cell line RAW 264.7.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Cell culture
The murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 was purchased from the
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, Md, USA)
containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum in a
humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air.
2.2. Cloning, expression, and purification of rWSP
The entire sequence of the gene encoding the Wolbachia
surface protein minus the predicted N-terminal signal sequence was
directionally cloned from genomic DNA extracted from
B. malayi by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The forward and
reverse primers were 5′CACCATGGATCCTGTTGGTCCAATAGC3′ and
5′TTAGAAATTAAACGCTATTCCAGC3′, respectively. The gene was
cloned into the pET100/D-TOPO expression vector (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, Calif, USA) and transformed into one-shot TOP10 cells
(Invitrogen). Plasmids containing inserts were selected by
amplicilin resistance and sequenced to confirm that the WSP gene
was intact and in the correct orientation.For expression, the WSP plasmid was transformed into E. coliBL21 (DE3) cells (Invitrogen). The rWSP-tagged
fusion protein was then induced to express at
37°C with 1 mM isopropyl
β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (Invitrogen). The rWSP was
first purified by treatment of lysozyme and B-PER bacteria protein
extraction reagent, according to the manufacturer's instructions
(Pierce, Rockford, Ill, USA), and then affinity-purified by
chromatography with Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, Calif,
USA). The purified rWSP protein was refolded upon dialysis.
Protein concentration was determined by a bicinchoninic acid (BCA)
protein assay (Pierce). The purity of the rWSP preparation, as
determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of
flight mass spectrometry analysis, was >90%. The rWSP
preparation contained 0.17 EU/mL of endotoxin as determined by
the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate test (BioWhittaker Inc.,
Walkersville, Md, USA; limit of detection of the assay was 0.06 EU/mL).
2.3. Treatments of murine macrophage RAW 264.7
cells with rWSP
1 × 105 RAW 264.7 cells were plated into individual
wells of 6-well plate and grown to ∼75% confluence
at 37°C. The cells were exposed to concentrations of the
rWSP that ranged from 9 to 0.1 μg/mL. The macrophage cells
were also stimulated with 0.1 μg/mL E. coli LPS
B026:B6 (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo, USA). For proteinase
K-treatment, 100 μg of the rWSP was treated with
1 mg of proteinase K at 55°C overnight, and
inactivated at 95°C for 10 minutes. Cell cultures were
treated with 10 μg (80.7 U)/mL polymyxin B sulfate
(Sigma). Immunoblotting with anti-rWSP antibodies was used to
confirm the complete digestion of the rWSP. The cells were
incubated with each treatment at 37°C for 3 hours, except
for the time-course experiment.
2.4. Relative quantification of proinflammatory cytokine mRNAs by
real-time RT-PCR
The RAW 264.7 cells were extracted for total RNA by using RNeasy
mini kit (Qiagen Inc.), according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Total RNA (1–5 μg) was used for
first-stand cDNA synthesis in a 20 μl-reaction using
0.5 μg of oligo (dT)12–18 (Invitrogen), 0.5 mM
dNTP mix, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 75 mM KCl, 3 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 40 units RNaseOUT recombinant
ribonuclease inhibitor (Invitrogen), and 200 units of superscript
II RNase H− RT (Invitrogen).PCR primers for murine IL-1β, IL-6, TNF, and β-actin
genes have been described previously [26]. A 50 μl
PCR reaction containing 1X-SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied
Biosystems, Foster City, Calif, USA), 50 nM of each forward
and reverse primers, and 2 μl of the cDNA sample. Thermal
cycling and data analysis were done on the ABI-prism 7700 sequence
detector (Applied Biosystems). Dissociation protocol was included
in the final step. The copy number of cytokine transcripts was
estimated from a standard curve and the mean of cytokine mRNA
levels was normalized utilizing the β-actin mRNA levels
from each sample. The data were represented as geometric mean of
fold change relative to untreated control cell cultured under
identical conditions.
2.5. Statistic analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired Student t
test, two-tailed. Log transformations were performed as
appropriate before the statistical analyses. Differences were
considered statistically significant with P < .05.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Dose-dependent cytokine responses to
rWSP in RAW 264.7 cells
At three hours postexposure, expression of IL-1β and IL-6
in RAW 264.7 cells in response to the rWSP was dose-dependent
(Figure 1). TNF transcription appeared to be less
responsive to different concentrations of rWSP
used in this study. In the RAW 264.7 cells, the
rWSP appeared to preferentially induce IL-1β over the
3-hour exposure period which ranged from a 4-fold increase at
0.3 μg/mL to a ∼300-fold increase in
transcription at the 9.0 μg/mL. Although lower, IL-6 was
also significantly elevated by the rWSP stimulation at 3 μg/mL
(6-fold) and 9 μg/mL (82-fold). Although the
transcription levels of IL-6 appeared to drop below that of the
untreated controls at the two lowest concentrations of rWSP, these
changes were not statistically significant. In contrast, during
the 3 hours of stimulation, the change in TNF transcription, while
significantly elevated compared to untreated controls, remained
under 10 folds for all of the concentrations of rWSP tested.
Figure 1
Dose response of rWSP-induced IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF mRNAs production in murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. The macrophage cells were incubated with various concentrations of rWSP for 3 hours. The data
represent mean values and standard deviations of fold increase of
cytokine transcripts relative to negative control in log scale.
Significant differences to untreated controls (*P < .01
for IL-1β mRNA levels and P < .05 for IL-6 and TNF mRNA levels) and to rWSP-stimulated cells at 9 μg/mL (**P < .05) are indicated.
3.2. Early induction of IL-1β mRNA expression, followed by
expression of TNF and IL-6 mRNAs
The kinetics of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF gene expressions in
RAW 264.7 cells was determined using the 9.0 μg/mL level
of rWSP at various time points (Figure 2). The rWSP
induced significant increases in the transcription of all three
cytokines as early as 1.5 hours postexposure with IL-1β
showing the most robust response with over a 2500-fold increase
compared to unstimulated cells. The increases at the early time
point for IL-6 and TNF were more modest at 5-fold and 20-fold,
respectively. The rWSP-induced transcription of IL-1β and
IL-6 peaked between 6 and 9 hours postexposure, while the peak in
TNF expression appeared to be between 3 and 6 hours. This earlier
peak in TNF expression could in part explain the relatively flat
responses to the different concentrations rWSP seen in
Figure 1. The transcription levels of IL-6 that
appeared to increase again at 24 hours postexposure were not
statistically significant whereas TNF expression had dropped to
near the levels of seen in the untreated control by this time. The
magnitude and kinetics of the cytokine responses to 9.0 μg/mL
rWSP paralleled those observed in control RAW 264.7 cells
exposed to 0.1 μg/mL of E. coli-derived LPS
(Figure 2).
Figure 2
Time-course analysis of rWSP-induced IL-1â (a), IL-6 (b),
and TNF (c) mRNAs expression in murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells.
Incubation of the macrophage cells with 9.0 μg/mL rWSP
(black symbols) or 0.1 μg/mL E. coli LPS (white
symbols) were performed at various time-points. The data represent
mean values and standard deviations of fold increase of cytokine
transcripts relative to negative control in log scale. Significant
differences to untreated controls are indicated as *P
< .05. ** Significant differences were found between
rWSP-stimulated cells at 1.5 hours and 3 hours postexposure as
well as between rWSP-stimulated cells at 3 hours and 6 hours
postexposure (for TNF mRNA levels; P < .05), while
*** significant differences were found between rWSP-stimulated cells at 3 hours and 6 hours postexposure as well as between
rWSP-stimulated cells at 6 hours and 9 hours postexposure (for
IL-1β and IL-6 mRNA levels; P < .01).
3.3. The cytokine responses to rWSP were not
due to LPS contamination
Because the rWSP used in these studies was derived from an
E. coli extract, it was possible that all or part of the
response was due to the trace contamination of bacterial LPS
(0.17 EU/mL). To test this possibility, an aliquot of the rWSP
preparation was pretreatment with proteinase K prior to
incubation with the RAW 264.7 cells. The protease treatment of the
rWSP preparation drastically abrogated the transcription of
IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF cytokines in macrophage RAW 264.7 cells
(Figure 3). The same treatment had no effect on the
activity of LPS. To further test for a possible role of LPS in the
rWSP response, polymyxin B, an LPS-neutralizing agent,
inhibited LPS-induced TNF mRNA expression by almost 90%
(reduced from 84 folds to 12 folds; P < .01) in the macrophage
cells, but this treatment had no demonstrable effect on either
low- or high-dose rWSP-induced TNF transcriptions
(Figure 4). Taken together, the results of the
protease digestion and polymyxin B experiments strongly
indicate that the trace LPS contamination of the rWSP preparation
did not significantly contribute to the ability of the rWSP
preparation to induce innate cytokine transcription from RAW 264.7
cells.
Figure 3
Effect of proteinase K treatment in rWSP-induced
IL-1â (a), IL-6 (b), and TNF (c) mRNAs expression in macrophage RAW 264.7
cells. The macrophage cells were incubated with 9 μg/mL
rWSP (WSP), 9 μg/mL rWSP pretreated with proteinase
K (WSPPK), 0.1 μg/mL LPS (LPS), and
0.1 μg/mL LPS pretreated with proteinase K (LPSPK) for 3
hours. The data represent mean values and standard deviations of
fold increase of cytokine transcripts relative to negative
control. Significant differences were found between WSP- and
WSPPK-treated cells (P < .05; indicated by **).
Figure 4
Effect of polymyxin
B treatment in rWSP-induced TNF mRNA expression in
macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. The macrophage cells were incubated
with rWSP (WSP; 1 and 9 μg/mL), polymyxin
B-treated rWSP (WSPPB), LPS (LPS; 0.1 μg/mL), and
polymyxin B-treated LPS (LPSPB) for 3 hours. The data
represent mean values and standard deviations of fold increase of
cytokine transcripts relative to negative control. Significant
differences were found between LPS- and LPSPB-treated cells
(P < .01; indicated by **).
4. DISCUSSION
The pathology of drug-induced adverse reactions in lymphatic
filariasis is characterized by the increased post-treatment
concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines, and inflammatory
mediators
[12-14]. Traditionally, these adverse reactions
have been blamed on IgE-mediated responses triggered by mass
release of parasite antigens—presumably from dead and dying
parasites [27]. However, there are little data to support
this mechanism [11]. In a murine model, significant levels of
TNF and detectable adverse reactions were induced after
antifilarial chemotherapy of naïve mice transfused with
B. malayi microfilariae [23]. These results from
animals that did not have time to produce an adaptive immune
response suggests that at least some component of the pathology of
drug-induced adverse reactions are due to innate immune responses
rather than the adaptive immune response. The innate
immune response can play an important role in the pathogenesis of
lymphatic filariasis, since infection of immunodeficientmice with
B. pahangi results in the development of T
cell-independent lymphedema [28]. In addition, the pathology
in T cell-deficient animals is associated with the accumulation of
macrophages, and the local secretion of inflammatory cytokines,
including IL-1â, IL-6, TNF, and GM-CSF in parasitized lymphatic
vessels [28, 29].Wolbachia are a key determinant to the induction of
innate inflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo studies, and
have been implicated to play an important role in the pathogenesis
of humanlymphatic filariasis
[19, 20,
23, 30,
31]. The TNF
production of mouse macrophages and neutrophils induced by
B. malayi extracts is dependent on the presence of
Wolbachia [19,
31]. While initial studies using the
Wolbachia from B. malayi indicated that LPS-like
molecules were major mediators of Wolbachia-mediated
inflammatory responses, it is now clear from the results of genome
sequencing that the B. malayi Wolbachia does not encode
the enzymes required for LPS synthesis [15] implying that other
Wolbachia-derived molecules are mediators of these
powerful innate immune responses.In this study, purified rWSP derived from B. malayi
Wolbachia proved to be a potent activator of the innate immune
system, as determined by the pronounced expression of
proinflammatory cytokine genes in the murine macrophage RAW 264.7
cells. A role for WSP as an inducer of innate responses is support
by the findings that a recombinant form of the WSP found on the
surface of the Wolbachia harbored by the filarial species
Dirofilaria immitis was capable of inducing a rapid
secreting of cytokines from human PBMC [24].
Hence, WSPs from
different filarial nematode hosts have a common ability to elicit
proinflammatory responses in cells of innate immune system.
However, it is of interest to determine whether different WSP
species exhibit the same characteristic of innate inflammatory
response. It is generally agreed that adverse reactions are more
severe in Brugia-infected individuals compared to those
infected with W. bancrofti [11]. Additional studies are
necessary to determine if these differences in clinical outcome
are due specifically to WSP-host cell interactions or other
bacterial-derived molecules.The transcription of proinflammatory cytokines in response to the
rWSP was dose-dependent and IL-1β was the dominant
transcription response in RAW 264.7 cells. The response to rWSP
was rapid with significantly elevated IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF
after only 1.5 hours of exposure. It will be interesting to
determine if the magnitude and kinetics of the innate response
documented here for murine-derived cells is recapitulated in human
cells.Studies have been conducted to determine the innate receptors that
important for host interactions with Wolbachia-derived
molecules. Activation of innate inflammatory responses by the
D. immitis Wolbachia WSP could be affected by signaling
through both TLR-2 and TLR-4 [24]. In contrast, the innate
inflammatory pathways activated by extracts containing the
Wolbachia from B. malayi or
Onchocerca volvulus
were shown to be dependent only on TLR2–TLR6
interactions and dependent on the adaptor molecules MyD88 and
TIRAP/Mal [32]. It is likely that the rWSP used in this study
also signaled through TLR2–TLR6. At this time, it is unclear what
the structural relationship between the WSP from the
B. malayi Wolbachia and the known TLR2–TLR6 ligands such as
lipoproteins, peptidoglycans, lipoarabinomannans [33].Although the role of Wolbachia in the pathogenesis of
adverse antifilarial drug reactions has not been definitively
established, the results of a recent study provide evidence to
support this hypothesis. In the results of clinical studies, prior
treatment of patients infected with W. bancrofti with a
3-week course of doxycycline to deplete Wolbachia
prevented adverse reactions during subsequent albendazole and
ivermectin treatment that resulted in worm killing. Importantly,
for individuals in the group that did not receive doxycycline the
levels of Wolbachia released into plasma were related to
the incidence of adverse reactions and to the levels of plasma
proinflammatory cytokines [34].In conclusion, the WSP from the B. malayi Wolbachia
elicited murine macrophages to rapidly
upregulate the transcription of the proinflammatory cytokines
IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF. Therefore, Wolbachia,
through their WSP, could play a role in the initiation of
inflammatory responses in humanpatients that are associated with
antifilarial drug treatment. The characteristics and mechanisms of
rWSP-induced IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF responses would be
valuable knowledge for alternative prevention and treatment of the
drug-induced adverse reactions.
Authors: Joseph D Turner; Sabine Mand; Alexander Yaw Debrah; Johannes Muehlfeld; Kenneth Pfarr; Helen F McGarry; Ohene Adjei; Mark J Taylor; Achim Hoerauf Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-03-14 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Amy G Hise; Katrin Daehnel; Illona Gillette-Ferguson; Eun Cho; Helen F McGarry; Mark J Taylor; Douglas T Golenbock; Katherine A Fitzgerald; James W Kazura; Eric Pearlman Journal: J Immunol Date: 2007-01-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Amélie v Saint André; Nathan M Blackwell; Laurie R Hall; Achim Hoerauf; Norbert W Brattig; Lars Volkmann; Mark J Taylor; Louise Ford; Amy G Hise; Jonathan H Lass; Eugenia Diaconu; Eric Pearlman Journal: Science Date: 2002-03-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Illona Gillette-Ferguson; Amy G Hise; Helen F McGarry; Joseph Turner; Andrew Esposito; Yan Sun; Eugenia Diaconu; Mark J Taylor; Eric Pearlman Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Laura Baldo; Christopher A Desjardins; Jacob A Russell; Julie K Stahlhut; John H Werren Journal: BMC Evol Biol Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 3.260
Authors: Huan Wang; Yifei Wu; David M Ojcius; X Frank Yang; Chenglin Zhang; Shibiao Ding; Xu'ai Lin; Jie Yan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240