BACKGROUND: In Europe, specific immunotherapy is currently conducted with vaccines containing allergen preparations based on intact extracts. In addition to this, chemically modified allergen extracts (allergoids) are used for specific allergy treatment. Reduced allergenicity and thereby reduced risk of side effects in combination with retained ability to activate T cells and induce protective allergen-specific antibody responses has been claimed for allergoids. In the current study, we compared intact allergen extracts and allergoids with respect to allergenicity and immunogenicity. METHODS: The immunological response to birch allergen extract, alum-adsorbed extract, birch allergoid and alum-adsorbed allergoid was investigated in vitro in human basophil histamine release assay and by stimulation of human allergen-specific T cell lines. In vivo, Bet v 1-specific IgG titers in mice were determined after repetitive immunizations. RESULTS: In all patients tested (n = 8), allergoid stimulations led to reduced histamine release compared to the intact allergen extract. However, the allergoid preparations were not recognized by Bet v 1-specific T cell lines (n = 7), which responded strongly to the intact allergen extract. Mouse immunizations showed a clearly reduced IgG induction by allergoids and a strongly potentiating effect of the alum adjuvant. Optimal IgG titers were obtained after 3 immunizations with intact allergen extracts, while 5 immunizations were needed to obtain maximal response to the allergoid. CONCLUSION: The reduced histamine release observed for allergoid preparations may be at the expense of immunological efficacy because the chemical modifications lead to a clear reduction in T cell activation and the ability to induce allergen-specific IgG antibody responses. Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND: In Europe, specific immunotherapy is currently conducted with vaccines containing allergen preparations based on intact extracts. In addition to this, chemically modified allergen extracts (allergoids) are used for specific allergy treatment. Reduced allergenicity and thereby reduced risk of side effects in combination with retained ability to activate T cells and induce protective allergen-specific antibody responses has been claimed for allergoids. In the current study, we compared intact allergen extracts and allergoids with respect to allergenicity and immunogenicity. METHODS: The immunological response to birch allergen extract, alum-adsorbed extract, birch allergoid and alum-adsorbed allergoid was investigated in vitro in human basophil histamine release assay and by stimulation of human allergen-specific T cell lines. In vivo, Bet v 1-specific IgG titers in mice were determined after repetitive immunizations. RESULTS: In all patients tested (n = 8), allergoid stimulations led to reduced histamine release compared to the intact allergen extract. However, the allergoid preparations were not recognized by Bet v 1-specific T cell lines (n = 7), which responded strongly to the intact allergen extract. Mouse immunizations showed a clearly reduced IgG induction by allergoids and a strongly potentiating effect of the alum adjuvant. Optimal IgG titers were obtained after 3 immunizations with intact allergen extracts, while 5 immunizations were needed to obtain maximal response to the allergoid. CONCLUSION: The reduced histamine release observed for allergoid preparations may be at the expense of immunological efficacy because the chemical modifications lead to a clear reduction in T cell activation and the ability to induce allergen-specific IgG antibody responses. Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: V Schulten; V Tripple; K Aasbjerg; V Backer; G Lund; P A Würtzen; A Sette; B Peters Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Bärbel Heydenreich; Iris Bellinghausen; Steffen Lorenz; Helene Henmar; Dennis Strand; Peter A Würtzen; Joachim Saloga Journal: Immunology Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 7.397
Authors: B Heydenreich; I Bellinghausen; L Lund; H Henmar; G Lund; P Adler Würtzen; J Saloga Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Eva Untersmayr; Susanne C Diesner; Gertie Janneke Oostingh; Kathrin Selzle; Tobias Pfaller; Cornelia Schultz; Yingyi Zhang; Durga Krishnamurthy; Philipp Starkl; Regina Knittelfelder; Elisabeth Förster-Waldl; Arnold Pollak; Otto Scheiner; Ulrich Pöschl; Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Albert Duschl Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M Angeles López-Matas; Mayte Gallego; Víctor Iraola; Douglas Robinson; Jerónimo Carnés Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-10-08 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Gandhi F Pavón-Romero; Maria Itzel Parra-Vargas; Fernando Ramírez-Jiménez; Esmeralda Melgoza-Ruiz; Nancy H Serrano-Pérez; Luis M Teran Journal: Cells Date: 2022-01-08 Impact factor: 6.600