UNLABELLED: The psychosocial strategies used by advanced cancer patients to manage anorexia are poorly described. A greater understanding of them may guide clinicians to provide appropriate interventions to patients and caregivers. METHODS: Glaserian Grounded Theory was used to recruit and analyse data from two women and seven men with advanced cancer suffering from anorexia. They were interviewed about the emotional and social impact of appetite loss and the strategies that they used to compensate for reduced food intake. RESULTS: Shifting to conscious control (overeating) was the basic social psychological process employed by participants to manage the emotional and social consequences of declining intake. Although a number of symptoms were found to contribute, nausea or the anticipation of emesis provoked by food was most commonly named as the ultimate barrier to eating. DISCUSSION: Participants retained the motivation and ability to eat without appetite, providing the intake of food did not provoke nausea or the anticipation of emesis. Nutritional interventions must be tailored around patients' eating capabilities. Counselling and education programmes that assist family members in understanding the shift to conscious control over eating are required.
UNLABELLED: The psychosocial strategies used by advanced cancerpatients to manage anorexia are poorly described. A greater understanding of them may guide clinicians to provide appropriate interventions to patients and caregivers. METHODS: Glaserian Grounded Theory was used to recruit and analyse data from two women and seven men with advanced cancer suffering from anorexia. They were interviewed about the emotional and social impact of appetite loss and the strategies that they used to compensate for reduced food intake. RESULTS: Shifting to conscious control (overeating) was the basic social psychological process employed by participants to manage the emotional and social consequences of declining intake. Although a number of symptoms were found to contribute, nausea or the anticipation of emesis provoked by food was most commonly named as the ultimate barrier to eating. DISCUSSION: Participants retained the motivation and ability to eat without appetite, providing the intake of food did not provoke nausea or the anticipation of emesis. Nutritional interventions must be tailored around patients' eating capabilities. Counselling and education programmes that assist family members in understanding the shift to conscious control over eating are required.
Authors: David Blum; Aurelius Omlin; Ken Fearon; Vickie Baracos; Lukas Radbruch; Stein Kaasa; Florian Strasser Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Karin Olson; Leslie Hayduk; Marilyn Cree; Ying Cui; Hue Quan; John Hanson; Peter Lawlor; Florian Strasser Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 4.615