Literature DB >> 17640837

Roadside oral fluid testing: comparison of the results of drugwipe 5 and drugwipe benzodiazepines on-site tests with laboratory confirmation results of oral fluid and whole blood.

Anna Pehrsson1, Teemu Gunnar, Charlotta Engblom, Heikki Seppä, Ahlam Jama, Pirjo Lillsunde.   

Abstract

Drugged drivers pose a serious threat to other people in traffic as well as to themselves. Reliable oral fluid screening devices for on-site screening of drugged drivers would be both a useful and convenient means for traffic control. In this study we evaluated the appropriateness of Drugwipe 5 and Drugwipe Benzodiazepines oral fluid on-site tests for roadside drug screening. Drivers suspected of driving under the influence of drugs were screened with the Drugwipe tests. Oral fluid and whole blood samples were collected from the drivers and tested for amphetamine-type stimulant drugs, cannabis, opiates, cocaine and benzodiazepines by immunological methods, GC and GC-MS. The performance evaluations of the tests were made by comparing the results of the Drugwipe tests with laboratory GC-MS confirmation results of oral fluid or whole blood. In addition to the performance evaluations of the Drugwipe tests based on laboratory results, a questionnaire on the practical aspects of the tests was written for the police officers who performed the tests. The aim of the questionnaire was to obtain user comments on the practicality of the tests as well as the advantages and weak points of the tests. The results of the performance evaluations were: for oral fluid (sensitivity; specificity; accuracy) amphetamines (95.5%; 92.9%; 95.3%), cannabis (52.2%; 91.2%; 85.1%), cocaine (50.0%; 99.3%; 98.6%), opiates (100%; 95.8%; 95.9%), benzodiazepines (74.4%; 84.2%; 79.2%) and for whole blood accordingly, amphetamines (97.7%; 86.7%; 95.9%), cannabis (68.3%; 87.9%; 84.9%), cocaine (50.0%; 98.5%; 97.7%), opiates (87.5%; 96.9%; 96.6%) and benzodiazepines (66.7%; 87.0%; 74.4%). Although the Drugwipe 5 successfully detected amphetamine-type stimulant drugs and the police officers were quite pleased with the current features of the Drugwipe tests, improvements must still be made regarding the detection of cannabis and benzodiazepines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17640837     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  5 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of the DrugWipe® 5/5+ on-site oral fluid screening device.

Authors:  Anna Pehrsson; Tom Blencowe; Kari Vimpari; Antti Impinen; Teemu Gunnar; Pirjo Lillsunde
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  On-site test for cannabinoids in oral fluid.

Authors:  Nathalie A Desrosiers; Dayong Lee; David M Schwope; Garry Milman; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Cannabinoids in oral fluid by on-site immunoassay and by GC-MS using two different oral fluid collection devices.

Authors:  Nathalie A Desrosiers; Garry Milman; Damodara R Mendu; Dayong Lee; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 4.  Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse.

Authors:  Wendy M Bosker; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  A Study on the Reliability of an On-Site Oral Fluid Drug Test in a Recreational Context.

Authors:  Stefano Gentili; Renata Solimini; Roberta Tittarelli; Giulio Mannocchi; Francesco Paolo Busardò
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.193

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.