Literature DB >> 17640818

Co-activation of the secondary somatosensory and auditory cortices facilitates frequency discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli.

Yoshinobu Iguchi1, Yoko Hoshi, Masahito Nemoto, Masato Taira, Isao Hashimoto.   

Abstract

The contribution of the auditory cortex to tactile information processing was studied by measuring somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs). Three kinds of vibrotactile stimuli with frequencies of 180, 280 and 380 Hz were randomly delivered on the right index finger with a probability of 40, 20 and 40%, respectively. Twenty normal subjects participated in four kinds of tasks: a control condition to ignore these stimuli, a simple task to discriminate the 280-Hz stimulus from the other two stimuli (discrimination task for the vibrotactile stimuli, Ts task), a feedback task modified from the Ts task by adding acoustic feedback of the vibratory frequency at 1300 ms poststimulus (tactile discrimination with auditory clues, TA), and an easy version of the TA task (TA-easy) to discriminate the 280-Hz stimulus (20% target) from the 180- or 380-Hz stimuli (80% nontarget). The Ts and TA tasks required accurate perception of the vibrotactile frequencies to discriminate among the three kinds of stimuli. Under such a task demand, the post hoc auditory feedback in the TA task was expected to induce acoustic imagery for the tactile sensation. The SEFs for the nontarget stimuli were analyzed. A middle-latency component (M150/200) was specifically evoked by the three discrimination tasks. In the Ts and TA-easy tasks, the M150/200 source indicated inferior parietal cortical activities (SII area). In the TA task, 11 subjects showed activity in both the SII area and the superior temporal auditory region and increased accuracy of discrimination compared with the Ts task, in contrast with other subjects who showed activity only in the SII area and small changes in task accuracy between the Ts and TA tasks. Asynchronous auditory feedback for the vibrotactile sensation induced the auditory cortex activity in the SEFs in relation to the progress in tactile discrimination, which suggested an induction of acoustic imagery to complement the tactile information processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17640818     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  8 in total

1.  Integration of auditory and vibrotactile stimuli: effects of frequency.

Authors:  E Courtenay Wilson; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sound enhances touch perception.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Johanan Hsu; Nafi E Yasar; L Caitlin Elmore; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

4.  Novel assessment of cortical response to somatosensory stimuli in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Nathalie L Maitre; Zachary P Barnett; Alexandra P F Key
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  A distributed frontotemporal network underlies gamma-band synchronization impairments in schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Daisuke Koshiyama; Makoto Miyakoshi; Yash B Joshi; Juan L Molina; Kumiko Tanaka-Koshiyama; Joyce Sprock; David L Braff; Neal R Swerdlow; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Selective Attention Gates the Interactive Crossmodal Coupling between Perceptual Systems.

Authors:  Silvia Convento; Md Shoaibur Rahman; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Separate mechanisms for audio-tactile pitch and loudness interactions.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Alison I Weber; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-13

8.  Altered functional connectivity differs in stroke survivors with impaired touch sensation following left and right hemisphere lesions.

Authors:  Peter Goodin; Gemma Lamp; Rishma Vidyasagar; David McArdle; Rüdiger J Seitz; Leeanne M Carey
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.881

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.