Michael F Reed1, William A Zagorski, Erik S Knudsen. 1. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0558, USA. michael.reed@uc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) is a key regulator of cell cycle progression and is functionally inactivated in the majority of human non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). The specific influence of RB on therapeutic response in NSCLC remains elusive. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the consequence of reintroduction of RB on checkpoint response and chemosensitivity in NSCLC cell lines. RB introduction into RB-proficient (NCI-H1299) and -deficient (H1734, H2172) NSCLC cells was achieved by adenoviral infection. RB/E2F target gene expression was determined by immunoblot analysis. Cell cycle response and viability after chemotherapeutic exposure were assessed by flow cytometry and MTT viability assay. RESULTS: RB reconstitution in RB-deficient lines restored regulation of topoIIalpha, thymidylate synthase, and cyclin A. Similarly, RB overexpression in RB-proficient cells caused further regulation of some RB/E2F target genes including thymidylate synthase and topoIIalpha. In addition, RB overexpression resulted in restoration of the G1 arrest mechanism. Exposure of RB-proficient cells to cisplatin, etoposide, or 5-fluorouracil elicited arrest in various phases of the cell cycle while lines deficient for RB exhibited different checkpoint responses. However, introduction of RB restored ability to arrest following chemotherapeutic exposure. Chemotherapeutic challenge resulted in varying effects on cellular viability independent of RB status, yet restoration of RB activity conferred partial chemoresistance. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that RB reconstitution into RB-deficient NSCLC lines establishes regulation of certain RB/E2F target genes and restores G1 arrest mechanisms. Furthermore, introduction of RB enhances the G1 checkpoint response to chemotherapeutics and decreases chemosensitivity. Knowledge of RB-dependent chemosensitivity may ultimately contribute to individualized therapy based on molecular characterization of tumors.
BACKGROUND: The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) is a key regulator of cell cycle progression and is functionally inactivated in the majority of humannon-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). The specific influence of RB on therapeutic response in NSCLC remains elusive. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the consequence of reintroduction of RB on checkpoint response and chemosensitivity in NSCLC cell lines. RB introduction into RB-proficient (NCI-H1299) and -deficient (H1734, H2172) NSCLC cells was achieved by adenoviral infection. RB/E2F target gene expression was determined by immunoblot analysis. Cell cycle response and viability after chemotherapeutic exposure were assessed by flow cytometry and MTT viability assay. RESULTS:RB reconstitution in RB-deficient lines restored regulation of topoIIalpha, thymidylate synthase, and cyclin A. Similarly, RB overexpression in RB-proficient cells caused further regulation of some RB/E2F target genes including thymidylate synthase and topoIIalpha. In addition, RB overexpression resulted in restoration of the G1 arrest mechanism. Exposure of RB-proficient cells to cisplatin, etoposide, or 5-fluorouracil elicited arrest in various phases of the cell cycle while lines deficient for RB exhibited different checkpoint responses. However, introduction of RB restored ability to arrest following chemotherapeutic exposure. Chemotherapeutic challenge resulted in varying effects on cellular viability independent of RB status, yet restoration of RB activity conferred partial chemoresistance. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that RB reconstitution into RB-deficient NSCLC lines establishes regulation of certain RB/E2F target genes and restores G1 arrest mechanisms. Furthermore, introduction of RB enhances the G1 checkpoint response to chemotherapeutics and decreases chemosensitivity. Knowledge of RB-dependent chemosensitivity may ultimately contribute to individualized therapy based on molecular characterization of tumors.
Authors: Timothy Winton; Robert Livingston; David Johnson; James Rigas; Michael Johnston; Charles Butts; Yvon Cormier; Glenwood Goss; Richard Inculet; Eric Vallieres; Willard Fry; Drew Bethune; Joseph Ayoub; Keyue Ding; Lesley Seymour; Barbara Graham; Ming-Sound Tsao; David Gandara; Kenneth Kesler; Todd Demmy; Frances Shepherd Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H Shinohara; J Zhou; K Yoshikawa; S Yazumi; K Ko; Y Yamaoka; T Mizukami; T Yoshida; S Akinaga; T Tamaoki; H Motoda; W F Benedict; R Takahashi Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Dimitrios J Stravopodis; Panagiotis K Karkoulis; Eumorphia G Konstantakou; Sophia Melachroinou; Angeliki Thanasopoulou; Gerasimos Aravantinos; Lukas H Margaritis; Ema Anastasiadou; Gerassimos E Voutsinas Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Maya M Zaharieva; Milen Kirilov; Minquang Chai; Stefan M Berger; Spiro Konstantinov; Martin R Berger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.240