Literature DB >> 17640653

Pulse wave propagation in a model human arterial network: assessment of 1-D numerical simulations against in vitro measurements.

Koen S Matthys1, Jordi Alastruey, Joaquim Peiró, Ashraf W Khir, Patrick Segers, Pascal R Verdonck, Kim H Parker, Spencer J Sherwin.   

Abstract

A numerical model based on the nonlinear, one-dimensional (1-D) equations of pressure and flow wave propagation in conduit arteries is tested against a well-defined experimental 1:1 replica of the human arterial tree. The tree consists of 37 silicone branches representing the largest central systemic arteries in the human, including the aorta, carotid arteries and arteries that perfuse the upper and lower limbs and the main abdominal organs. The set-up is mounted horizontally and connected to a pulsatile pump delivering a periodic output similar to the aortic flow. Terminal branches end in simple resistance models, consisting of stiff capillary tubes leading to an overflow reservoir that reflects a constant venous pressure. The parameters required by the numerical algorithm are directly measured in the in vitro set-up and no data fitting is involved. Comparison of experimental and numerical pressure and flow waveforms shows the ability of the 1-D time-domain formulation to capture the main features of pulse wave propagation measured throughout the system test. As a consequence of the simple resistive boundary conditions used to reduce the uncertainty of the parameters involved in the simulation, the experimental set-up generates waveforms at terminal branches with additional non-physiological oscillations. The frequencies of these oscillations are well captured by the 1-D model, even though amplitudes are overestimated. Adding energy losses in bifurcations and including fluid inertia and compliance to the purely resistive terminal models does not reduce the underdamped effect, suggesting that wall visco-elasticity might play an important role in the experimental results. Nevertheless, average relative root-mean-square errors between simulations and experimental waveforms are smaller than 4% for pressure and 19% for the flow at all 70 locations studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17640653     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  36 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges.

Authors:  Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Dynamics of pulsatile flow in fractal models of vascular branching networks.

Authors:  Anh Bui; Ilija D Sutalo; Richard Manasseh; Kurt Liffman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  BLOOD FLOW IN THE CIRCLE OF WILLIS: MODELING AND CALIBRATION.

Authors:  Kristen Devault; Pierre A Gremaud; Vera Novak; Mette S Olufsen; Guillaume Vernières; Peng Zhao
Journal:  Multiscale Model Simul       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Model-based assessment of dynamic arterial blood volume flow from ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  C A D Leguy; E M H Bosboom; A P G Hoeks; F N van de Vosse
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Numerical Method of Characteristics for One-Dimensional Blood Flow.

Authors:  Sebastian Acosta; Charles Puelz; Béatrice Riviére; Daniel J Penny; Craig G Rusin
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  A systematic comparison between 1-D and 3-D hemodynamics in compliant arterial models.

Authors:  Nan Xiao; Jordi Alastruey; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Numerical simulation of blood flow and pressure drop in the pulmonary arterial and venous circulation.

Authors:  M Umar Qureshi; Gareth D A Vaughan; Christopher Sainsbury; Martin Johnson; Charles S Peskin; Mette S Olufsen; N A Hill
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2014-03-09

8.  On the mechanics underlying the reservoir-excess separation in systemic arteries and their implications for pulse wave analysis.

Authors:  Jordi Alastruey
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng       Date:  2010-12

9.  A computational study of pressure wave reflections in the pulmonary arteries.

Authors:  M Umar Qureshi; N A Hill
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 10.  An introduction to wave intensity analysis.

Authors:  Kim H Parker
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.