Literature DB >> 17640411

Narrow and wide field amacrine cells fire action potentials in response to depolarization and light stimulation.

Stephanie J Heflin1, Paul B Cook.   

Abstract

Action potentials in amacrine cells are important for lateral propagation of signals across the inner retina, but it is unclear how many subclasses of amacrine cells contain voltage-gated sodium channels or can fire action potentials. This study investigated the ability of amacrine cells with narrow ( <200 microm) and wide (>200 microm) dendritic fields to fire action potentials in response to depolarizing current injections and light stimulation. The pattern of action potentials evoked by current injections revealed two distinct classes of amacrine cells; those that responded with a single action potential (single-spiking cells) and those that responded with repetitive action potentials (repetitive-spiking cells). Repetitive-spiking cells differed from single-spiking cells in several regards: Repetitive-spiking cells were more often wide field cells, while single-spiking cells were more often narrow field cells. Repetitive-spiking cells had larger action potential amplitudes, larger peak voltage-gated NaV currents lower action potential thresholds, and needed less current to induce action potentials. However, there was no difference in the input resistance, holding current or time constant of these two classes of cells. The intrinsic capacity to fire action potentials was mirrored in responses to light stimulation; single-spiking amacrine cells infrequently fired action potentials to light steps, while repetitive-spiking amacrine cells frequently fired numerous action potentials. These results indicate that there are two physiologically distinct classes of amacrine cells based on the intrinsic capacity to fire action potentials.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17640411     DOI: 10.1017/S095252380707040X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  11 in total

1.  Whole-cell recordings of light evoked excitatory synaptic currents in the retinal slice.

Authors:  Birgit Werner; Paul B Cook; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Light adaptation alters inner retinal inhibition to shape OFF retinal pathway signaling.

Authors:  Reece E Mazade; Erika D Eggers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Mechanisms underlying lateral GABAergic feedback onto rod bipolar cells in rat retina.

Authors:  Andrés E Chávez; William N Grimes; Jeffrey S Diamond
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Hypericin prolongs action potential duration in hippocampal neurons by acting on K+ channels.

Authors:  Y Wang; X Shi; Z Qi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Voltage- and calcium-gated ion channels of neurons in the vertebrate retina.

Authors:  Matthew J Van Hook; Scott Nawy; Wallace B Thoreson
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Nitric oxide promotes GABA release by activating a voltage-independent Ca2+ influx pathway in retinal amacrine cells.

Authors:  J Wesley Maddox; Evanna Gleason
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Diverse mechanisms underlie glycinergic feedback transmission onto rod bipolar cells in rat retina.

Authors:  Andrés E Chávez; Jeffrey S Diamond
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Localization of the paranodal protein Caspr in the mammalian retina.

Authors:  Brendan J O'Brien; Arlene A Hirano; Elizabeth D Buttermore; Manzoor A Bhat; Elior Peles
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 2.367

9.  All spiking, sustained ON displaced amacrine cells receive gap-junction input from melanopsin ganglion cells.

Authors:  Aaron N Reifler; Andrew P Chervenak; Michael E Dolikian; Brian A Benenati; Benjamin Y Li; Rebecca D Wachter; Andrew M Lynch; Zachary D Demertzis; Benjamin S Meyers; Fady S Abufarha; Elizabeth R Jaeckel; Michael P Flannery; Kwoon Y Wong
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Inner retinal inhibition shapes the receptive field of retinal ganglion cells in primate.

Authors:  D A Protti; S Di Marco; J Y Huang; C R Vonhoff; V Nguyen; S G Solomon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.