OBJECT: Medically refractory dystonia has recently been treated using deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the globus pallidus internus (GPI). Outcomes have varied depending on the features of the dystonia. There has been limited literature regarding outcomes for refractory dystonia following DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). METHODS: Four patients with medically refractory, predominantly cervical dystonia underwent STN DBS. Intraoperative assessments with the patients in a state of general anesthesia were performed to determine the extent of fixed deformities that might predict outcome. Patients were rated using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) preoperatively and 3 and 12 months following surgery by a rater blinded to the study. Mean changes and standard errors of the mean in scores were calculated for each subscore of the two scales. Scores were also analyzed using analysis of variance and probability values were generated. Neuropsychological assessments and quality of life ratings using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were evaluated longitudinally. RESULTS: Significant improvements were seen in motor (p = 0.04), disability (p = 0.02), and total TWSTRS scores (p = 0.03). Better outcomes were seen in those patients who did not have fixed deformities. There was marked improvement in the mental component score of the SF-36. Neuropsychological function was not definitively impacted as a result of the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Deep brain stimulation of the STN is a novel target for dystonia and may be an alternative to GPI DBS. Further studies need to be performed to confirm these conclusions and to determine optimal candidates and stimulation parameters.
OBJECT: Medically refractory dystonia has recently been treated using deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the globus pallidus internus (GPI). Outcomes have varied depending on the features of the dystonia. There has been limited literature regarding outcomes for refractory dystonia following DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). METHODS: Four patients with medically refractory, predominantly cervical dystonia underwent STN DBS. Intraoperative assessments with the patients in a state of general anesthesia were performed to determine the extent of fixed deformities that might predict outcome. Patients were rated using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) preoperatively and 3 and 12 months following surgery by a rater blinded to the study. Mean changes and standard errors of the mean in scores were calculated for each subscore of the two scales. Scores were also analyzed using analysis of variance and probability values were generated. Neuropsychological assessments and quality of life ratings using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were evaluated longitudinally. RESULTS: Significant improvements were seen in motor (p = 0.04), disability (p = 0.02), and total TWSTRS scores (p = 0.03). Better outcomes were seen in those patients who did not have fixed deformities. There was marked improvement in the mental component score of the SF-36. Neuropsychological function was not definitively impacted as a result of the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Deep brain stimulation of the STN is a novel target for dystonia and may be an alternative to GPI DBS. Further studies need to be performed to confirm these conclusions and to determine optimal candidates and stimulation parameters.
Authors: Harrison C Walker; He Huang; Christopher L Gonzalez; James E Bryant; Jeffrey Killen; Gary R Cutter; Robert C Knowlton; Erwin B Montgomery; Bart L Guthrie; Ray L Watts Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Alberto Albanese; Francesca Del Sorbo; Cynthia Comella; H A Jinnah; Jonathan W Mink; Bart Post; Marie Vidailhet; Jens Volkmann; Thomas T Warner; Albert F G Leentjens; Pablo Martinez-Martin; Glenn T Stebbins; Christopher G Goetz; Anette Schrag Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2013-06-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Lauren E Schrock; Jill L Ostrem; Robert S Turner; Shoichi A Shimamoto; Philip A Starr Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Takashi Tsuboi; Joshua K Wong; Leonardo Almeida; Christopher W Hess; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Pawan V Rawal; Leonardo Almeida; Luke B Smelser; He Huang; Barton L Guthrie; Harrison C Walker Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2014-01-18 Impact factor: 8.955