Literature DB >> 17639473

Vascular rupture during angioplasty of hemodialysis raft-related stenoses.

J N Pappas1, T M Vesely.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the incidence and outcome of angioplasty-induced ruptures that occurred during treatment of hemodialysis graft-related stenoses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a five year period 1222 patients with dysfunctional or thrombosed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) hemodialysis grafts underwent angioplasty procedures at our institution. Angioplasty-induced vascular ruptures occurred in 24 (2.0%) patients. The locations of these ruptures were: basilic vein (10), venous anastomosis (7), cephalic vein (5), brachial vein (1) and intragraft (1). The mean length of the treated stenoses was 2.4 centimeters.
RESULTS: Manual compression was used to treat the vascular rupture in ten patients. One patient was treated with endovascular balloon tamponade and one patient underwent stenting of the rupture site. Despite the rupture, 15 patients had completion of the angioplasty procedure. In nine patients the procedure was abandoned due to persistent stenosis at the rupture site. There were no major complications as a result of these ruptures. Follow-up was available in ten of these patients. All ten underwent at least one successful hemodialysis treatment. In five of these patients the hemodialysis graft failed within 30 days after the rupture. The mean primary patency following rupture in the ten patients with follow-up was 87.5 days (range 5 - 225 days).
CONCLUSION: The incidence of angioplasty-induced vascular rupture of hemodialysis-related stenoses is low and despite the injury, the majority (62%) of procedures can be completed. However, in our experience the long-term patency of the vascular access was suboptimal.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 17639473     DOI: 10.1177/112972980200300307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Access        ISSN: 1129-7298            Impact factor:   2.283


  5 in total

1.  Problematic declots: complications and irritations.

Authors:  Brian Funaki
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Iatrogenic percutaneous vascular injuries: clinical presentation, imaging, and management.

Authors:  Benjamin H Ge; Alexander Copelan; Dominic Scola; Micah M Watts
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Definitions and End Points for Interventional Studies for Arteriovenous Dialysis Access.

Authors:  Gerald A Beathard; Charmaine E Lok; Marc H Glickman; Ahmed A Al-Jaishi; Donna Bednarski; David L Cull; Jeffery H Lawson; Timmy C Lee; Vandana D Niyyar; Donna Syracuse; Scott O Trerotola; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; Surendra Shenoy; Margo Underwood; Haimanot Wasse; Karen Woo; Theodore H Yuo; Thomas S Huber
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Treatment of hemodialysis vascular access rupture irresponsive to prolonged balloon tamponade: retrospective evaluation of the effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate seal-off technique.

Authors:  Mei-Jui Weng; Matt Chiung-Yu Chen; Huei-Lung Liang; Huay-Ben Pan
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Stent grafts improved patency of ruptured hemodialysis vascular accesses.

Authors:  Min-Tsun Liao; Chien-Ming Luo; Ming-Chien Hsieh; Mu-Yang Hsieh; Chih-Ching Lin; Wei-Chu Chie; Ten-Fang Yang; Chih-Cheng Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.