Literature DB >> 17638048

An integrated framework for multipollutant air quality management and its application in Georgia.

Daniel S Cohan1, James W Boylan, Amit Marmur, Maudood N Khan.   

Abstract

Air protection agencies in the United States increasingly confront non-attainment of air quality standards for multiple pollutants sharing interrelated emission origins. Traditional approaches to attainment planning face important limitations that are magnified in the multipollutant context. Recognizing those limitations, the Georgia Environmental Protection Division has adopted an integrated framework to address ozone, fine particulate matter, and regional haze in the state. Rather than applying atmospheric modeling merely as a final check of an overall strategy, photochemical sensitivity analysis is conducted upfront to compare the effectiveness of controlling various precursor emission species and source regions. Emerging software enables the modeling of health benefits and associated economic valuations resulting from air pollution control. Photochemical sensitivity and health benefits analyses, applied together with traditional cost and feasibility assessments, provide a more comprehensive characterization of the implications of various control options. The fuller characterization both informs the selection of control options and facilitates the communication of impacts to affected stakeholders and the public. Although the integrated framework represents a clear improvement over previous attainment-planning efforts, key remaining shortcomings are also discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17638048     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-006-0228-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

Review 1.  Air pollution and health.

Authors:  Bert Brunekreef; Stephen T Holgate
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Francesca Dominici; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Optimization-based source apportionment of PM2.5 incorporating gas-to-particle ratios.

Authors:  Amit Marmur; Alper Unal; James A Mulholland; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Cost-benefit analysis in the selection of efficient multipollutant strategies.

Authors:  Lauraine G Chestnut; David M Mills; Daniel S Cohan
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Daniel S Cohan; Amir Hakami; Yongtao Hu; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Preliminary evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality model for 2002 over the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Ralph E Morris; Dennis E McNally; Thomas W Tesche; Gail Tonnesen; James W Boylan; Patricia Brewer
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; Daniel Krewski; Kazuhiko Ito; George D Thurston
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  A Photosynthesis-based Two-leaf Canopy Stomatal Conductance Model for Meteorology and Air Quality Modeling with WRF/CMAQ PX LSM.

Authors:  Limei Ran; Jonathan Pleim; Conghe Song; Larry Band; John T Walker; Francis S Binkowski
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.261

2.  Assessment of air quality in Haora River basin using fuzzy multiple-attribute decision making techniques.

Authors:  Ajit Pratap Singh; Sumanta Chakrabarti; Sumit Kumar; Anjaney Singh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  An assessment of important SPECIATE profiles in the EPA emissions modeling platform and current data gaps.

Authors:  Casey D Bray; Madeleine Strum; Heather Simon; Lee Riddick; Mike Kosusko; Marc Menetrez; Michael D Hays; Venkatesh Rao
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Risk-based prioritization among air pollution control strategies in the Yangtze River Delta, China.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Joshua S Fu; Guoshun Zhuang; Jonathan I Levy
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  An Integrated Agriculture, Atmosphere, and Hydrology Modeling System for Ecosystem Assessments.

Authors:  L Ran; Y Yuan; E Cooter; V Benson; D Yang; J Pleim; R Wang; J Williams
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.660

6.  Resource allocation for mitigating regional air pollution-related mortality: A summertime case study for five cities in the United States.

Authors:  Kuo-Jen Liao; Xiangting Hou; Matthew J Strickland
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.235

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.