Literature DB >> 17636846

Parenteral anticoagulation for prolonging survival in patients with cancer who have no other indication for anticoagulation.

E A Akl1, F F van Doormaal, M Barba, G Kamath, S Y Kim, S Kuipers, S Middeldorp, V Yosuico, H O Dickinson, H J Schünemann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Basic research and clinical studies have generated the hypothesis that anticoagulation may improve survival in patients with cancer through an antitumour effect in addition to the antithrombotic effect.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of heparin (including unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)) and fondaparinux to improve survival of patients with cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search for studies of anticoagulation in cancer patients including (1) A January 2007 electronic search of the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI the Web of Science; (2) Hand search of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and of the American Society of Hematology; (3) Checking of references of included studies; and (4) Use of "related article" feature in PubMed. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cancer patients without clinical evidence of venous thromboembolism comparing UFH, LMWH or fondaparinux to no intervention or placebo and RCTs comparing two of the three agents of interest. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Using a standardized form we extracted in duplicate data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest including all cause mortality, venous thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, major bleeding and minor bleeding. MAIN
RESULTS: Of 3986 identified citations five RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In all included RCTs the intervention consisted of heparin ( either UFH or LMWH). The overall methodological quality of the included studies was acceptable. Overall, heparin therapy was associated with a statistically and clinically significant survival benefit (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.91). In subgroup analyses, patients with limited small cell lung cancer experienced a clear survival benefit (HR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.83). The survival benefit was not statistically significant for either patients with extensive small cell lung cancer (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.06) or patients with advanced cancer (HR = 0.84; 95%: 0.68 to 1.03). The increased risk of bleeding with heparin was not statistically significant (RR = 1.78; 95% CI: 0.73 to 4.38). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Heparin has a survival benefit in cancer patients in general, and in patients with limited small cell lung cancer in particular. Heparin might be particularly beneficial in cancer patients with limited cancer or a longer life expectancy. Future research should investigate the survival benefit of different types of anticoagulants (in different dosing, schedules and duration of therapy) in patients with different types and stages of cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17636846     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  23 in total

1.  Playing games with a thrombus: a dangerous match. Paradoxical embolism from a huge central venous cathether thrombus: a case report.

Authors:  Nuno Cardim; Júlia Toste; Vanessa Carvalho; Igor Nunes; Daniel Ferreira; Vanda Carmelo; Ana S N Oliveira; José Ferro; Sylvie Mariana; Adelaide Almeida; Francisco P Machado; José Roquette
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.062

2.  Pancreatic cancer: A model cancer for the study of the therapeutic effects of anticoagulants.

Authors:  Anthony Maraveyas
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15

Review 3.  A systematic review of Cochrane anticoagulation reviews.

Authors:  David Keith Cundiff
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2009-01-06

4.  Suppression of pancreatic cancer by sulfated non-anticoagulant low molecular weight heparin.

Authors:  Thangirala Sudha; Murat Yalcin; Hung-Yun Lin; Ahmed M Elmetwally; Tipu Nazeer; Thiruvengadam Arumugam; Patricia Phillips; Shaker A Mousa
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Perioperative management of antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy.

Authors:  Arthur W Bracey
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 6.  Does clinical method mask significant VTE-related mortality and morbidity in malignant disease?

Authors:  A Maraveyas; M Johnson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  A low molecular weight heparin inhibits experimental metastasis in mice independently of the endothelial glycocalyx.

Authors:  Geerte L Van Sluis; Max Nieuwdorp; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Johan van der Vlag; Cornelis J F Van Noorden; C Arnold Spek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Long-term use of daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism: why hesitate any longer?

Authors:  Philippe Debourdeau; Ismail Elalamy; Axelle de Raignac; Paul Meria; Jean Marc Gornet; Yahovi Amah; Wolfang Korte; Michel Marty; Dominique Farge
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Pharmacological profiles of animal- and nonanimal-derived sulfated polysaccharides--comparison of unfractionated heparin, the semisynthetic glucan sulfate PS3, and the sulfated polysaccharide fraction isolated from Delesseria sanguinea.

Authors:  Inken Groth; Niels Grünewald; Susanne Alban
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.313

Review 10.  The potential benefits of low-molecular-weight heparins in cancer patients.

Authors:  Francisco Robert
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 17.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.