Literature DB >> 17636779

Vaccines for preventing smallpox.

W Metzger1, B G Mordmueller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smallpox was eradicated by 1980, but its possible use as a bioweapon has rekindled interest in the development of protective vaccines. Therefore, stockpiled calf lymph-derived vaccines and recently developed cell-cultured vaccines have been investigated to contribute information to smallpox emergency response plans, while newer (non-replication competent) vaccines are developed.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of smallpox vaccines in preventing the disease, in inducing immunity, and in regard to adverse events. SEARCH STRATEGY: In December 2006, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and Current Controlled Trials, and handsearched Index Medicus. We also searched three databases of vaccine safety in December 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of smallpox vaccines versus placebo, other smallpox or non-smallpox vaccine, no intervention, or different dose of the same vaccine in people receiving smallpox vaccination irrespective of age. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We combined dichotomous data using relative risk with a random-effects model. MAIN
RESULTS: Ten trials involving 2412 participants were included. The vaccines investigated were calf-lymph derived first-generation vaccines (Dryvax, APVS, Lancy-vaxina, Lister), and cell-cultured second-generation vaccines (ACAM, CCSV). Vaccines were investigated in different dilutions. All undiluted vaccines induced a reaction in 95% of people vaccinated in terms of pustule and immunogenicity. Also 1:10 dilutions were fully efficient when the starting concentration was defined. Serious adverse events were reported in 1% to 2% of the volunteers. Fever was observed in 11% to 22% of participants, and headache in roughly half of the participants. Fever was less frequent when new vaccines were administered, but rates of headache were similar in new and old vaccines. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence shows that stockpiled vaccines have maintained their immunogenicity and new cell-cultured vaccines are similar to stockpiled vaccines in terms of vaccination success rate and immunogenicity. First- and second-generation vaccines diluted to at least 1:10 are as effective as undiluted vaccine in terms of clinical success rate and immunogenicity. Dilution did not reduce the frequency of adverse events. Success rate and immunogenicity were similar in naive and previously vaccinated persons, but there were fewer adverse events in previously vaccinated persons. The rate of adverse events found in this review reveals the need for further development and improvement of smallpox vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17636779      PMCID: PMC6532594          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004913.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  13 in total

Review 1.  Lessons from a modern review of the smallpox eradication files.

Authors:  Wolfram G Metzger; Carsten Köhler; Benjamin Mordmüller
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Assessment of the protective effect of Imvamune and Acam2000 vaccines against aerosolized monkeypox virus in cynomolgus macaques.

Authors:  Graham J Hatch; Victoria A Graham; Kevin R Bewley; Julia A Tree; Mike Dennis; Irene Taylor; Simon G P Funnell; Simon R Bate; Kimberley Steeds; Thomas Tipton; Thomas Bean; Laura Hudson; Deborah J Atkinson; Gemma McLuckie; Melanie Charlwood; Allen D G Roberts; Julia Vipond
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  The identification of HLA class II-restricted T cell epitopes to vaccinia virus membrane proteins.

Authors:  Richard B Kennedy; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 4.  Smallpox vaccines for biodefense.

Authors:  Richard B Kennedy; Inna Ovsyannikova; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Impact of distinct poxvirus infections on the specificities and functionalities of CD4+ T cell responses.

Authors:  Nicholas A Siciliano; Adam R Hersperger; Aimee M Lacuanan; Ren-Huan Xu; John Sidney; Alessandro Sette; Luis J Sigal; Laurence C Eisenlohr
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Variable immunogenicity of a vivax malaria blood-stage vaccine candidate.

Authors:  Sai Lata De; Samuel May; Keshav Shah; Michelle Slawinski; Siriruk Changrob; Shulin Xu; Samantha J Barnes; Patchanee Chootong; Francis B Ntumngia; John H Adams
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Political will and international collaborative frameworks in infectious diseases.

Authors:  R A Stein
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Demographic and clinical factors associated with response to smallpox vaccine in preimmunized volunteers.

Authors:  Philippe Bossi; Frédérick Gay; Imène Fouzai; Béhazine Combadière; Geneviève Brousse; Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes; Jean-Marc Crance; Brigitte Autran; Daniel Garin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The immunology of smallpox vaccines.

Authors:  Richard B Kennedy; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Robert M Jacobson; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 7.486

10.  Repeated high-dose (5 × 10(8) TCID50) toxicity study of a third generation smallpox vaccine (IMVAMUNE) in New Zealand white rabbits.

Authors:  Julia A Tree; Graham Hall; Peter Rees; Julia Vipond; Simon G P Funnell; Allen D Roberts
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.