Literature DB >> 17636657

WITHDRAWN: Interventions for treating headlice.

C S Dodd1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection with head lice is a widespread condition in developed and developing countries. Infection occurs most commonly in children, but also affects adults. If left untreated the condition can become intensely irritating and skin infections may occur if the bites are scratched.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to assess the effects of interventions for head lice. SEARCH STRATEGY: Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialized trials register (July 2002); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2002); MEDLINE and TOXLINE (1966 to July 2002); EMBASE (1980 to May 2002); LILACS (July 2002); Science Citation Index (1981 to July 2002); BIOSIS (1985 to July 2002); reference lists of relevant articles; pharmaceutical companies producing pediculicides (published and unpublished trials); UK and US Regulatory Authorities. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials (published and unpublished) or trials using alternate allocation were sought which compared pediculicides with the same and different formulations of other pediculicides, and pediculicides with physical methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Of the 71 identified studies, only four met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. One reviewer extracted the data. MAIN
RESULTS: We found no evidence that any one pediculicide has greater effect than another. The two studies comparing malathion and permethrin with their respective vehicles showed a higher cure rate for the active ingredient than the vehicle. Another study comparing synergised pyrethrins with permethrin showed their effects to be equivalent. A comparative trial of malathion lotion vs combing, showed combing to be ineffective for the cureative treatment of head lice infection. Adverse effects were reported in a number of trials and were all minor, although reporting quality varied between trials. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Permethrin, synergised pyrethrin and malathion were effective in the treatment of head lice. However, the emergence of drug resistance since these trials were conducted means there is no direct contemporary evidence of the comparative effectiveness of these products. The 'best' choice will now depend on local resistance patterns. Physical treatment methods(BugBusting) were shown ot be ineffective to treat head lice. No evidence exists regarding other chemical control methods such as the use of herbal treatments, when used in the curative treatment of head lice. Future trials should take into account the methodological recommendations that arise from this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17636657      PMCID: PMC6532744          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001165.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  78 in total

1.  Head lice--developing a practical approach.

Authors:  I F Burgess
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1998-02

2.  The methodology and operation of a pilot randomized control trial of the effectiveness of the Bug Busting method against a single application insecticide product for head louse treatment.

Authors:  P Bingham; S Kirk; N Hill; J Figueroa
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.427

3.  An assessment of two carbaryl preparations.

Authors:  S Preston
Journal:  R Soc Health J       Date:  1979-08

4.  A field study of the effects of ivermectin on ectoparasites of man.

Authors:  C L Dunne; C J Malone; J A Whitworth
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.184

5.  [Head louse infestation among girls in an orphanage and women in a mental hospital and mass-delousing with bioallethrin (PARA aerosol)].

Authors:  K S Pai
Journal:  Kisaengchunghak Chapchi       Date:  1992-03

6.  Head lice infestation: single drug versus combination therapy with one percent permethrin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

Authors:  R B Hipolito; F G Mallorca; Z O Zuniga-Macaraig; P C Apolinario; J Wheeler-Sherman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Head lice infestation: bug busting vs. traditional treatment.

Authors:  L Plastow; M Luthra; R Powell; J Wright; D Russell; M N Marshall
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.036

8.  Comparison of wet combing with malathion for treatment of head lice in the UK: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  R J Roberts; D Casey; D A Morgan; M Petrovic
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-12       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Chemotherapy of head louse (Pediculus humanus capitis) infestation gamma benzene hexachloride (gamma-BHC) among school children in Szu-Hu District, Yunlin County, Central West Taiwan.

Authors:  P C Fan; D Chao; K M Lee; C H Chan; H Y Liu
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei)       Date:  1991-07

10.  Evaluation of efficacy of four pediculicides against head louse (Pediculus capitis) infestation.

Authors:  P C Fan; W C Chung; C L Kuo; C Y Lin; H M Hsu; C H Chuang; C Y Chow
Journal:  Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi       Date:  1992-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  A stochastic model for head lice infections.

Authors:  Patricia Stone; Hilde Wilkinson-Herbots; Valerie Isham
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Dimeticone in the Treatment of Lice Infestation through Prophylaxis of Classmates.

Authors:  Pietro Ferrara; Francesca Del Bufalo; Valerio Romano; Eloisa Tiberi; Giorgia Bottaro; Lorenza Romani; Monica Malamisura; Francesca Ianniello; Laura Ceni; Giovanni Mottini; Antonio Gatto
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 1.429

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.