Literature DB >> 17636629

Medicinal and injection therapies for mechanical neck disorders.

P Peloso1, A Gross, T Haines, K Trinh, C H Goldsmith, S Burnie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy persists regarding medicinal therapies and injections.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of medication and injections on primary outcomes (e.g. pain) for adults with mechanical neck disorders and whiplash. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL, MANTIS, CINAHL from their start to May 2006; MEDLINE and EMBASE to December 2006. We scrutinised reference lists for other trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials with adults with neck disorders, with or without associated headache or radicular findings. We considered medicinal and injection therapies, regardless of route of administration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected articles, abstracted data and assessed methodological quality. When clinical heterogeneity was absent, we combined studies using random-effects models. MAIN
RESULTS: We found 36 trials that examined the effects of oral NSAIDs, psychotropic agents, steroid injections, and anaesthetic agents. Trials had a mean of 3.1 on the Jadad Scale for methodological quality; 70% were high quality. For acute whiplash, administering intravenous methylprednisolone within eight hours of injury reduced pain at one week (SMD -0.90, 95% CI -1.57 to -0.24), and sick leave but not pain at six months compared to placebo in one trial. For chronic neck disorders at short-term follow-up, intramuscular injection of lidocaine was superior to placebo (SMD -1.36, 95% CI -1.93 to -0.80); NNT 3, treatment advantage 45% and dry needling, but similar to ultrasound in one trial each. In chronic neck disorders with radicular findings, epidural methylprednisolone and lidocaine reduced neck pain and improved function more than when given by intramuscular route at one-year follow-up, in one trial. In subacute and chronic neck disorders, muscle relaxants, analgesics and NSAIDs had limited evidence and unclear benefits. In participants with chronic neck disorders with or without radicular findings or headache, there was moderate evidence from five high quality trials that Botulinum toxin A intramuscular injections had similar effects to saline in improving pain (pooled SMD: -0.39, 95%CI -1.25 to 0.47), disability or global perceived effect. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The major limitations are the lack of replication of the findings and sufficiently large trials. There is moderate evidence for the benefit of intravenous methylprednisolone given within eight hours of acute whiplash, from a single trial. Lidocaine injection into myofascial trigger points appears effective in two trials. There is moderate evidence that Botulinum toxin A is not superior to saline injection for chronic MND. Muscle relaxants, analgesics and NSAIDs had limited evidence and unclear benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17636629     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000319.pub4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  33 in total

1.  What Does the Cochrane Collaboration Say about Neck Disorders?

Authors: 
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders, whiplash-associated disorders, or non-specific low back pain? A systematic review of systematic reviews by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.

Authors:  Jessica J Wong; Pierre Côté; Arthur Ameis; Sharanya Varatharajan; Thepikaa Varatharajan; Heather M Shearer; Robert J Brison; Deborah Sutton; Kristi Randhawa; Hainan Yu; Danielle Southerst; Rachel Goldgrub; Silvano Mior; Maja Stupar; Linda J Carroll; Anne Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Myofascial Trigger Points Then and Now: A Historical and Scientific Perspective.

Authors:  Jay P Shah; Nikki Thaker; Juliana Heimur; Jacqueline V Aredo; Siddhartha Sikdar; Lynn Gerber
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Manipulation and Mobilization for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for an Appropriateness Panel.

Authors:  Ian D Coulter; Cindy Crawford; Howard Vernon; Eric L Hurwitz; Raheleh Khorsan; Marika Suttorp Booth; Patricia M Herman
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 5.  Pharmacological Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women.

Authors:  Erin T Carey; Sara R Till; Sawsan As-Sanie
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Prevalence, practice patterns, and evidence for chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Adam P Goode; Janet Freburger; Timothy Carey
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey.

Authors:  Johannes Fleckenstein; Daniela Zaps; Linda J Rüger; Lukas Lehmeyer; Florentina Freiberg; Philip M Lang; Dominik Irnich
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Role of rehabilitation medicine and physical agents in the treatment of cancer-associated pain.

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Jeffrey R Basford
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Effect of treatment on trigger points.

Authors:  Javid Majlesi; Halil Unalan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2010-10

10.  Exploring patient satisfaction: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of spinal manipulation, home exercise, and medication for acute and subacute neck pain.

Authors:  Brent D Leininger; Roni Evans; Gert Bronfort
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.