BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the benefits of 18fluoro-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in the detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) recurrence in patients with negative clinical follow-up. METHODS: Whole-body 18FDG-PET was performed in 30 patients treated for HNSCC without any clinical element for recurrence. RESULTS: Twenty-one negative PET and 9 positive results were seen. One patient with abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in the laryngeal area did not have recurrent HNSCC (false positive). Eight had proven recurrence. The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of HNSCC recurrence were 100% (8/8) and 95% (21/22), respectively. The positive predictive value was 89% (8/9). The negative predictive value was 100% (21/21). The overall accuracy was 97% (29/30). CONCLUSION: The results of our study confirm the high effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in assessment of HNSCC recurrence and suggest that it is more accurate than conventional physical examination follow-up alone.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the benefits of 18fluoro-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in the detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) recurrence in patients with negative clinical follow-up. METHODS: Whole-body 18FDG-PET was performed in 30 patients treated for HNSCC without any clinical element for recurrence. RESULTS: Twenty-one negative PET and 9 positive results were seen. One patient with abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in the laryngeal area did not have recurrent HNSCC (false positive). Eight had proven recurrence. The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of HNSCC recurrence were 100% (8/8) and 95% (21/22), respectively. The positive predictive value was 89% (8/9). The negative predictive value was 100% (21/21). The overall accuracy was 97% (29/30). CONCLUSION: The results of our study confirm the high effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in assessment of HNSCC recurrence and suggest that it is more accurate than conventional physical examination follow-up alone.
Authors: Gianpiero Manca; Eleonora Vanzi; Domenico Rubello; Francesco Giammarile; Gaia Grassetto; Ka Kit Wong; Alan C Perkins; Patrick M Colletti; Duccio Volterrani Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Benjamin R Roman; Shivangi Lohia; Nandita Mitra; Marilene B Wang; Anna M Pou; F Christopher Holsinger; David Myssiorek; David Goldenberg; David A Asch; Judy A Shea Journal: Head Neck Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 3.147