Literature DB >> 17635919

B- and C-RAF display essential differences in their binding to Ras: the isotype-specific N terminus of B-RAF facilitates Ras binding.

Andreas Fischer1, Mirko Hekman, Jürgen Kuhlmann, Ignacio Rubio, Stefan Wiese, Ulf R Rapp.   

Abstract

Recruitment of RAF kinases to the plasma membrane was initially proposed to be mediated by Ras proteins via interaction with the RAF Ras binding domain (RBD). Data reporting that RAF kinases possess high affinities for particular membrane lipids support a new model in which Ras-RAF interactions may be spatially restricted to the plane of the membrane. Although the coupling features of Ras binding to the isolated RAF RBD were investigated in great detail, little is known about the interactions of the processed Ras with the functional and full-length RAF kinases. Here we present a quantitative analysis of the binding properties of farnesylated and nonfarnesylated H-Ras to both full-length B- and C-RAF in the presence and absence of lipid environment. Although isolated RBD fragments associate with high affinity to both farnesylated and nonfarnesylated H-Ras, the full-length RAF kinases revealed fundamental differences with respect to Ras binding. In contrast to C-RAF that requires farnesylated H-Ras, cytosolic B-RAF associates effectively and with significantly higher affinity with both farnesylated and nonfarnesylated H-Ras. To investigate the potential farnesyl binding site(s) we prepared several N-terminal fragments of C-RAF and found that in the presence of cysteine-rich domain only the farnesylated form of H-Ras binds with high association rates. The extreme N terminus of B-RAF turned out to be responsible for the facilitation of lipid independent Ras binding to B-RAF, since truncation of this region resulted in a protein that changed its kinase properties and resembles C-RAF. In vivo studies using PC12 and COS7 cells support in vitro results. Co-localization measurements using labeled Ras and RAF documented essential differences between B- and C-RAF with respect to association with Ras. Taken together, these data suggest that the activation of B-RAF, in contrast to C-RAF, may take place both at the plasma membrane and in the cytosolic environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17635919     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M607458200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  33 in total

Review 1.  Mechanistic principles of RAF kinase signaling.

Authors:  Christian M Udell; Thanashan Rajakulendran; Frank Sicheri; Marc Therrien
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Drosophila Raf's N terminus contains a novel conserved region and can contribute to torso RTK signaling.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Oren Tchaicheeyan; Linda Ambrosio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Quantitative in vivo fluorescence cross-correlation analyses highlight the importance of competitive effects in the regulation of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Wakako Sadaie; Yoshie Harada; Michiyuki Matsuda; Kazuhiro Aoki
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Guidelines for biomarker testing in metastatic melanoma: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.

Authors:  S Martín-Algarra; M T Fernández-Figueras; J A López-Martín; A Santos-Briz; A Arance; M D Lozano; A Berrocal; J J Ríos-Martín; E Espinosa; J L Rodríguez-Peralto
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Single substitution within the RKTR motif impairs kinase activity but promotes dimerization of RAF kinase.

Authors:  Angela Baljuls; Regina Mahr; Inge Schwarzenau; Thomas Müller; Lisa Polzien; Mirko Hekman; Ulf R Rapp
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Regulation of RAF protein kinases in ERK signalling.

Authors:  Hugo Lavoie; Marc Therrien
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Piconewton-Scale Analysis of Ras-BRaf Signal Transduction with Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Chae-Seok Lim; Cheng Wen; Yanghui Sheng; Guangfu Wang; Zhuan Zhou; Shiqiang Wang; Huaye Zhang; Anpei Ye; J Julius Zhu
Journal:  Small       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 13.281

8.  Anionic Lipids Impact RAS-Binding Site Accessibility and Membrane Binding Affinity of CRAF RBD-CRD.

Authors:  Timothy Travers; Cesar A López; Constance Agamasu; Jeevapani J Hettige; Simon Messing; Angel E García; Andrew G Stephen; S Gnanakaran
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 9.  The Mystery of Rap1 Suppression of Oncogenic Ras.

Authors:  Ruth Nussinov; Hyunbum Jang; Mingzhen Zhang; Chung-Jung Tsai; Anna A Sablina
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-03-02

10.  Genetic and functional characterization of putative Ras/Raf interaction inhibitors in C. elegans and mammalian cells.

Authors:  Vanessa González-Pérez; David J Reiner; Jamie K Alan; Cicely Mitchell; Lloyd J Edwards; Vladimir Khazak; Channing J Der; Adrienne D Cox
Journal:  J Mol Signal       Date:  2010-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.