| Literature DB >> 17635645 |
Feixiong Zhang1, Kishore B S Pasumarthi.
Abstract
The recent discovery of several myogenic cardiac progenitor cells in the post-natal heart suggests that some myocardial cells may remain undifferentiated during embryonic development. In this study, we examined the subcellular characteristics of the embryonic (E) mouse ventricular myocardial cells using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). At the ultrastructural level, we identified three different cell populations within the myocardial layer of the E11.5 heart. These cells were designated as undifferentiated cells (43 +/- 6%), moderately differentiated cells (43 +/- 2%) and mature cardiomyocytes (14 +/- 4%). Undifferentiated cells contained a large nucleus and sparse cytoplasm with no myofibrillar bundles. Moderately differentiated cells contained randomly arranged myofilaments in the cytoplasm. In contrast, mature cardiomyocytes contained well-developed sarcomere structures. We also confirmed the presence of similar undifferentiated cells albeit at low levels in the E16.5 ( approximately 20%) and E18.5 ( approximately 7%) myocardium. Further we used immunogold labeling technique to test whether these distinct cell populations were also positive for markers such as Nkx2.5, ISL1 and ANF. A preponderance of anti-Nkx2.5 label was found in the undifferentiated and moderately differentiated cell types. Anti-ANF label was found only in the cytoplasmic compartment of moderately differentiated and mature myocardial cells. All of the undifferentiated cells were negative for anti-ANF labeling. We did not find immuno-gold labeling with ISL1 in any of the three myocardial cell types. Based on these results, we suggest that embryonic myocardial cell differentiation is a gradual process and undifferentiated cells expressing Nkx2.5 in post-chamber myocardium may represent a progenitor cell population while cells expressing Nkx2.5 and ANF represent differentiating myocytes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17635645 PMCID: PMC3922360 DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00044.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
1Ultrastructure analysis of E 11.5 ventricular myocardium. (A) Two adjacent undifferentiated cells with sparse cytoplasm: note the presence of belt desmsomes between these two cells (arrows), Scale bar = 2 μm. (B) A moderately differentiated myocardial cell with loosely arranged myofilaments (arrowhead) and a primitive sarcomere (arrow) in the cytoplasm, Scale bar = 2 μm. (C) A mature myocardial cell containing myofilament bundles with well-defined sarcomeres (arrow-heads), Scale bar = 500 nm. (D) A belt desmosome (arrow) between two undifferentiated cells, Scale bar = 100 nm. (E) A spot desmosome (arrow) between moderately differentiated cells, Scale bar = 500 nm. (F) An intercalated disc between two mature myocardial cells: fascia adherens (arrowheads) and desmosome (arrow). Scale bar = 500 nm.
2Relative distribution of undifferentiated (UC), moderately differentiated (MDC) and mature (MC) myocardial cells in E11.5 ventricular myocardial cell layer. Data is presented as mean value ± S.E.M., N= A total of 1000 cells from five different hearts. *^ρ < 0.005 compared to MC.
Relative distribution of three myocardial cell types in the ventricular myocardium during development
| E11.5 | 43.0 ± 5.5% | 43.0 ± 2.0% | 14.0 ± 4.2% |
| E16.5 | 20.0 ± 2.1%^ | 42.0 ± 2.3% | 38.0 ± 1.0% |
| E18.5 | 7.0 ± 0.3%$ | 32 ± 0.4%^^ | 61.0 ± 0.7% |
Data is presented as mean ± S.E.M., N= A total of 600–1000 cells from three to five hearts per group.
p < 0.05 E11.5 UC versus E16.5 UC and p < 0.005 E11.5 UC versus E18.5 UC.
*p < 0.005 E11.5 MC versus E11.5 UC and E11.5 MDC.
#p < 0.05 E11.5 MC versus E16.5 MC and p < 0.005 E11.5 MC versus E18.5 MC.
^<0.05 E16.5 UC versus E16.5 MDC.
<0.05 E18.5 UC versus E18.5 MDC and p < 0.005 E18.5 UC versus E18.5 MC.
<0.005 E18.5 MDC versus E18.5 MC.
3Immunogold labeling of undifferentiated myocardial cells.(A) A lower magnification of E11.5 undifferentiated cell processed for immunostaining with ANF antibodies, Scale bar = 500 nm.(B) A higher magnification of the boxed area in panel A showing the absence of immunogold probe directed against ANF, Scale bar = 100 nm. (C) Undifferentiated cell with clusters of immunogold probe directed against the transcription factor Nkx2.5 (arrowheads) in the nuclear compartment, Scale bar = 100 nm.
4Immunogold labeling of moderately differentiated and mature myocardial cells. (A and B) Clusters (arrowheads) of immunogold probe directed against the transcription factor Nkx 2.5 in a moderately differentiated cell (A) and a mature myocardial cell (B). Note the presence of well-organized sarcomeres (S) in the mature cell. Scale bars: A = 100 nm, B = 500 nm. (C and D) Clusters (arrowheads) of immunogold probe directed against ANF in a moderately differentiated cell (C) and a mature myocardial cell (D). Note the association of anti-ANF label with secretory granules. Scale bars: (C and D) = 100 nm.
5Double immunogold labeling of E11.5 ventricular myocardial cells. (A) Moderately differentiated myocardial cell with anti-Nkx2.5 label (10 nm gold particles, arrowheads) in the nuclear compartment and anti-ANF label (5 nm gold particles, arrow) in the cytoplasm, Scale bar = 100 nm. (B) Relative distribution of E11.5 ventricular myocardial cells positive for Nkx2.5 and or ANF. Data is presented as mean value ± S.E.M., N = A total of 400 cells from three different hearts. *p < 0.005 Nkx2.5+versus Nkx+/ANF+ and ANF+, ^p < 0.005 Nkx+/ANF+versus ANF+.