Literature DB >> 17635426

A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway with facemask and oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by critical care nurses in children.

J A Rechner1, V J Loach, M T Ali, V S Barber, J D Young, D G Mason.   

Abstract

The laryngeal mask airway is included as a first line airway device during adult resuscitation by first responders. However, there is little evidence for its role in paediatric resuscitation. Using anaesthetised children as a model for paediatric cardiopulmonary arrest, we compared the ability of critical care nurses to manually ventilate the anaesthetised child via the laryngeal mask airway compared with the facemask and oropharyngeal airway. The airway devices were inserted in random order and chest expansion was measured using an ultrasound distance transducer. The critical care nurses were able to place the laryngeal mask airway and achieve successful ventilation in 82% of children compared to 70% using the facemask and oropharyngeal airway, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.136). The median time to first successful breath using the laryngeal mask airway was 39 s compared to 25 s using the facemask (p < 0.001). In this group of nurses, we did not show a difference in ventilation via a laryngeal mask airway or facemask, although facemask ventilation was achieved more quickly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17635426     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05140.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  7 in total

1.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Guidelines for paediatric emergency equipment and supplies for a physician's office.

Authors:  M Feldman
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  [Not Available].

Authors:  M Feldman
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  [Comments on the 2010 guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the European Resuscitation Council].

Authors:  V Wenzel; S G Russo; H R Arntz; J Bahr; M A Baubin; B W Böttiger; B Dirks; U Kreimeier; M Fries; C Eich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Improving patient safety after rigid bronchoscopy in adults: laryngeal mask airway versus face mask - a pilot study.

Authors:  Fulvio Nisi; Antonio Galzerano; Gaetano Cicchitto; Francesco Puma; Vito Aldo Peduto
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 7.  [Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth].

Authors:  John Madar; Charles C Roehr; Sean Ainsworth; Hege Ersda; Colin Morley; Mario Rüdiger; Christiane Skåre; Tomasz Szczapa; Arjan Te Pas; Daniele Trevisanuto; Berndt Urlesberger; Dominic Wilkinson; Jonathan P Wyllie
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 0.892

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.