Literature DB >> 17635399

Low antibiotic resistance rates in Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp but not in Enterobacter spp and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a prospective observational study in 14 Swedish ICUs over a 5-year period.

H Hanberger1, L G Burman, O Cars, M Erlandsson, H Gill, L E Nilsson, D Nordlinder, S M Walther.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intensive care units (ICUs) are hot zones for emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance because of frequent invasive procedures, antibiotic usage and transmission of bacteria. We report prospective data on antibiotic use and bacterial resistance from 14 academic and non-academic ICUs, participating in the ICU-STRAMA programme 1999-2003.
METHODS: The quantity of antibiotics delivered to each ICU was calculated as defined daily doses per 1,000 occupied bed days (DDD(1,000)). Specimens for culture were taken on clinical indications and only initial isolates were considered. Species-related breakpoints according to the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics were used. Antibiotic resistance was defined as the sum of intermediate and resistant strains.
RESULTS: Mean antibiotic use increased from 1,245 DDD(1,000) in 1999 to 1,510 DDD(1,000) in 2003 (P = 0.11 for trend). Of Staphylococcus aureus, 0-1.8% were methicillin resistant (MRSA). A presumptive extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype was found in <2.4% of Escherichia coli, based on cefotaxime susceptibility, except a peak in 2002 (4.6%). Cefotaxime resistance was found in 2.6-4.9% of Klebsiella spp. Rates of resistance among Enterobacter spp. to cefotaxime (20-33%) and among Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem (22-33%) and ciprofloxacin (5-21%) showed no time trend.
CONCLUSION: MRSA and cefotaxime-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella spp strains were few despite high total antibiotic consumption. This may be the result of a slow introduction of resistant strains into the ICUs, and good infection control. The cause of imipenem and ciprofloxacin resistance in P. aeruginosa could reflect the increased consumption of these agents plus spread of resistant clones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17635399     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01364.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  5 in total

1.  Temporary coverage of burns with a xenograft and sequential excision, compared with total early excision and autograft.

Authors:  M Elmasry; I Steinvall; J Thorfinn; P Olofsson; A H Abbas; I Abdelrahman; O A Adly; F Sjoberg
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-09-30

2.  Surveillance of microbial resistance in European Intensive Care Units: a first report from the Care-ICU programme for improved infection control.

Authors:  Håkan Hanberger; Dilek Arman; Hans Gill; Vlastimil Jindrák; Smilja Kalenic; Andrea Kurcz; Monica Licker; Paul Naaber; Elizabeth A Scicluna; Václav Vanis; Sten M Walther
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  [Relevance of ESBL-producing pathogens for clinical surgery: diagnostics, therapy, and prevention].

Authors:  S Lehner; B Grabein; P Pfaller; R Kopp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Dramatic increase of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli in German intensive care units: secular trends in antibiotic drug use and bacterial resistance, 2001 to 2008.

Authors:  Elisabeth Meyer; Frank Schwab; Barbara Schroeren-Boersch; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Clonal Relatedness among Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from ICU-Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Hamid Vaez; Sharareh Moghim; Bahram Nasr Esfahani; Hajieh Ghasemian Safaei
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.