R Wenzel1, D Jones, J A Borrego. 1. Diamond Headache Clinic Inpatient Unit, Chicago, IL 60657, USA. rich.wenzel@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Because of the unique pharmacology and clinical versatility of botulinum toxin (BoNT), particularly BoNT serotype A (BoNTA), a need exists for discussion of the current data on similarities and differences between two BoNTA products, BOTOX and Dysport. METHODS: We compared the physiochemical and pharmacological properties of BOTOX and Dysport using information from the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) documents from a number of countries around the world. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our analysis based on the SmPC documents demonstrated distinct differences in physical characteristics, breadth of approved indications, dosing and administration, and the incidence and severity of adverse events. CONCLUSION: BOTOX and Dysport are not bioequivalent. Many of the differences between BOTOX and Dysport discussed within are probably related to the differences in their physical characteristics.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Because of the unique pharmacology and clinical versatility of botulinum toxin (BoNT), particularly BoNT serotype A (BoNTA), a need exists for discussion of the current data on similarities and differences between two BoNTA products, BOTOX and Dysport. METHODS: We compared the physiochemical and pharmacological properties of BOTOX and Dysport using information from the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) documents from a number of countries around the world. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our analysis based on the SmPC documents demonstrated distinct differences in physical characteristics, breadth of approved indications, dosing and administration, and the incidence and severity of adverse events. CONCLUSION: BOTOX and Dysport are not bioequivalent. Many of the differences between BOTOX and Dysport discussed within are probably related to the differences in their physical characteristics.
Authors: M R Delgado; D Hirtz; M Aisen; S Ashwal; D L Fehlings; J McLaughlin; L A Morrison; M W Shrader; A Tilton; J Vargus-Adams Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-01-26 Impact factor: 9.910