Literature DB >> 17635161

European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology.

A Herbert1, C Bergeron, H Wiener, U Schenck, P Klinkhamer, J Bulten, M Arbyn.   

Abstract

There are many different systems of cytology classification used in the member states of the European Union (EU) and many different languages. The following short annexe to Chapter 3 of the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening provides a framework that will allow different terminologies and languages to be translated into standard terminology based on the Bethesda system (TBS) for cytology while retaining the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) classification for histology. This approach has followed extensive consultation with representatives of many countries and professional groups as well as a discussion forum published in Cytopathology (2005;16:113). This article will describe the reporting of specimen adequacy, which is dealt with in more detail elsewhere in Chapter 3 of the guidelines, the optional general categorization recommended in TBS, the interpretation/cytology result and other comments that may be made on reports such as concurrent human papillomavirus testing and the use of automation review and recommendations for management. The main categories in TBS will be described in the context of CIN, dyskaryosis and dysplasia terminologies so that all may be translated into the same framework. These guidelines should allow European countries to adapt their terminology in such a way as to make their screening programmes comparable with each other as well as with programmes elsewhere in the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17635161     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00469.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


  16 in total

1.  Method comparison between Munich II and III nomenclature for Pap smear samples.

Authors:  Christoph Cirkel; Claudia Barop; Daniel A Beyer
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-11-02

2.  Integrated morphologic and molecular analysis of Trichomonas vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, and human papillomavirus using cytologic smear preparations.

Authors:  I Nikas; A Hapfelmeier; M Mollenhauer; D Angermeier; M Bettstetter; R Götz; M Schmidmayr; V Seifert-Klauss; A Muckenhuber; U Schenck; Gregor Weirich
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second edition--summary document.

Authors:  M Arbyn; A Anttila; J Jordan; G Ronco; U Schenck; N Segnan; H Wiener; A Herbert; L von Karsa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 4.  How to evaluate emerging technologies in cervical cancer screening?

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Guglielmo Ronco; Jack Cuzick; Nicolas Wentzensen; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 5.  p16(INK4a) immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Tsoumpou; M Arbyn; M Kyrgiou; N Wentzensen; G Koliopoulos; P Martin-Hirsch; V Malamou-Mitsi; E Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 6.  Common cancer in a wild animal: the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) as an emerging model for carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Helen M Browning; Frances M D Gulland; John A Hammond; Kathleen M Colegrove; Ailsa J Hall
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Early detection of cervical carcinomas: finding an overall approach.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines.

Authors:  Andrzej Nowakowski; Marek Cybulski; Andrzej Śliwczyński; Arkadiusz Chil; Zbigniew Teter; Przemysław Seroczyński; Marc Arbyn; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Informatics applied to cytology.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; Maryanne Hornish; Robert A Goulart
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 2.091

10.  3q26 amplification is an effective negative triage test for LSIL: a historical prospective study.

Authors:  Erica R Heitmann; Kamani M Lankachandra; Jeff Wall; George D Harris; Hollie J McKinney; G Reza Jalali; Yogita Verma; Eric Kershnar; Michael W Kilpatrick; Petros Tsipouras; Diane M Harper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.