Literature DB >> 17635140

Computational studies of Family A and Family B GPCRs.

S Vohra1, S V Chintapalli, C J R Illingworth, P J Reeves, P M Mullineaux, H S X Clark, M K Dean, G J G Upton, C A Reynolds.   

Abstract

A full picture of the similarities between Family A and Family B GPCRs (G-protein coupled receptors) has been frustrated by the lack of clear homology between the respective sequences. Here, we review previous computational studies on GPCR dimerization in which the putative dimerization interfaces have been analysed using entropy, the ET (evolutionary trace) method and related methods. The results derived from multiple sequence alignments of Family A subfamilies have been mapped on to the rhodopsin crystal structure using standard alignments. Similarly, the results for the Family B alignments have been mapped on to the rhodopsin crystal structure using the 'cold-spot' alignment. For both Family A and Family B GPCRs, the sequence analysis indicates that there are functional sites on essentially all transmembrane helices, consistent with the parallel daisy chain model of GPCR oligomerization in which each GPCR makes interactions with a number of neighbouring GPCRs. The results are not too sensitive to the quality of the alignment. Molecular Dynamics simulations of the activation process within a single transmembrane bundle of the rhodopsin and the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor have been reviewed; the key observation, which is consistent with other computational studies, is that there is a translation and bending of helix 6, which contributes to a significant opening out of the intracellular face of the receptor, as shown in the accompanying movies. The simulations required the application of specific experiment-derived harmonic and half-harmonic distance restraints and so the application of such simulations to Family B GPCRs requires considerable care because of the alignment problem. Thus, in order to address the alignment problem, we have exploited the observation that GCR1, a plant GPCR, has homology with Family A, Family B and Family E GPCRs. The resulting alignment for transmembrane helix 3 is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17635140     DOI: 10.1042/BST0350749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans        ISSN: 0300-5127            Impact factor:   5.407


  16 in total

1.  Structures of the CXCR4 chemokine GPCR with small-molecule and cyclic peptide antagonists.

Authors:  Beili Wu; Ellen Y T Chien; Clifford D Mol; Gustavo Fenalti; Wei Liu; Vsevolod Katritch; Ruben Abagyan; Alexei Brooun; Peter Wells; F Christopher Bi; Damon J Hamel; Peter Kuhn; Tracy M Handel; Vadim Cherezov; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  On the expanding terminology in the GPCR field: the meaning of receptor mosaics and receptor heteromers.

Authors:  Luigi F Agnati; Diego Guidolin; Jean Pierre Vilardaga; Francisco Ciruela; Kjell Fuxe
Journal:  J Recept Signal Transduct Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.092

Review 3.  A day in the life of a G protein-coupled receptor: the contribution to function of G protein-coupled receptor dimerization.

Authors:  G Milligan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Computational study of the heterodimerization between mu and delta receptors.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Ming Kai; Lian Jin; Rui Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Plant signaling in stress: G-protein coupled receptors, heterotrimeric G-proteins and signal coupling via phospholipases.

Authors:  Narendra Tuteja; Sudhir K Sopory
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2008-02

Review 6.  Calcitonin and calcitonin receptor-like receptors: common themes with family B GPCRs?

Authors:  James Barwell; Joseph J Gingell; Harriet A Watkins; Julia K Archbold; David R Poyner; Debbie L Hay
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Model of the complex of Parathyroid hormone-2 receptor and Tuberoinfundibular peptide of 39 residues.

Authors:  Mirna Abraham-Nordling; Bengt Persson; Erik Nordling
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-10-27

Review 8.  Signaling through G protein coupled receptors.

Authors:  Narendra Tuteja
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-10-14

Review 9.  Computational approaches for modeling GPCR dimerization.

Authors:  Xuan-Yu Meng; Mihaly Mezei; Meng Cui
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.837

Review 10.  Increasingly accurate dynamic molecular models of G-protein coupled receptor oligomers: Panacea or Pandora's box for novel drug discovery?

Authors:  Marta Filizola
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 5.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.