OBJECTIVE: To understand how multidisciplinary care plans are being used in the management of patients with diabetes, and to explore the role of collaboration in care planning. DESIGN: Grounded theory interview study. SETTING: Primary care, June 2005 to October 2006. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight people from three New South Wales Divisions of General Practice: 19 general practitioners, eight diabetes-related allied health providers, two endocrinologists, and nine adults with type 2 diabetes. Sampling was purposeful then theoretical. RESULTS: GPs use care plans to organise clinical care and help patients access allied health providers. Written plans are used to educate patients about their care and to motivate change. GPs rarely discuss care plans with other providers, and providers are unlikely to change their approach to patients on the basis of care plans. Patients do not expect to participate in care planning. CONCLUSIONS: Care planning may increase evidence-based multidisciplinary care for patients with diabetes, but it rarely results in genuine collaboration between providers and patients. This suggests a difference may exist between Australian policymakers' and providers' definitions of patients with complex needs. Care plans could facilitate patient self-management by including more personalized information. Further research is needed to clarify which patients would benefit from a truly collaborative approach to their care.
OBJECTIVE: To understand how multidisciplinary care plans are being used in the management of patients with diabetes, and to explore the role of collaboration in care planning. DESIGN: Grounded theory interview study. SETTING: Primary care, June 2005 to October 2006. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight people from three New South Wales Divisions of General Practice: 19 general practitioners, eight diabetes-related allied health providers, two endocrinologists, and nine adults with type 2 diabetes. Sampling was purposeful then theoretical. RESULTS: GPs use care plans to organise clinical care and help patients access allied health providers. Written plans are used to educate patients about their care and to motivate change. GPs rarely discuss care plans with other providers, and providers are unlikely to change their approach to patients on the basis of care plans. Patients do not expect to participate in care planning. CONCLUSIONS: Care planning may increase evidence-based multidisciplinary care for patients with diabetes, but it rarely results in genuine collaboration between providers and patients. This suggests a difference may exist between Australian policymakers' and providers' definitions of patients with complex needs. Care plans could facilitate patient self-management by including more personalized information. Further research is needed to clarify which patients would benefit from a truly collaborative approach to their care.
Authors: Jenni Burt; Jo Rick; Thomas Blakeman; Joanne Protheroe; Martin Roland; Pete Bower Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 1.458
Authors: Joanne Protheroe; Tom Blakeman; Peter Bower; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Anne Kennedy Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Timothy M E Davis; Kerry Hunt; Daniel McAullay; Stephen A P Chubb; Brett A Sillars; David G Bruce; Wendy A Davis Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kay Jones; Trisha Dunning; Beth Costa; Kristine Fitzgerald; Akuh Adaji; Colin Chapman; Leon Piterman; Moira Paterson; Peter Schattner; John Catford Journal: Int J Family Med Date: 2012-02-09
Authors: Heidi Welberry; Margo Linn Barr; Elizabeth J Comino; Ben F Harris-Roxas; Elizabeth Harris; Shona Dutton; Tony Jackson; Debra Donnelly; Mark Fort Harris Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 2.655