Literature DB >> 17634969

Sample size and optimal design for logistic regression with binary interaction.

Eugene Demidenko1.   

Abstract

There is no consensus on what test to use as the basis for sample size determination and power analysis. Some authors advocate the Wald test and some the likelihood-ratio test. We argue that the Wald test should be used because the Z-score is commonly applied for regression coefficient significance testing and therefore the same statistic should be used in the power function. We correct a widespread mistake on sample size determination when the variance of the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) is estimated at null value. In our previous paper, we developed a correct sample size formula for logistic regression with single exposure (Statist. Med. 2007; 26(18):3385-3397). In the present paper, closed-form formulas are derived for interaction studies with binary exposure and covariate in logistic regression. The formula for the optimal control-case ratio is derived such that it maximizes the power function given other parameters. Our sample size and power calculations with interaction can be carried out online at www.dartmouth.edu/ approximately eugened. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17634969     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  44 in total

1.  A two-stage strategy to accommodate general patterns of confounding in the design of observational studies.

Authors:  Sebastien Haneuse; Jonathan Schildcrout; Daniel Gillen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Approximations of the power functions for Wald, likelihood ratio, and score tests and their applications to linear and logistic regressions.

Authors:  Eugene Demidenko
Journal:  Model Assist Stat Appl       Date:  2020-12-25

3.  Did changes in drug reimbursement after the medicare modernization act affect chemotherapy prescribing?

Authors:  Mark C Hornbrook; Jennifer Malin; Jane C Weeks; Solomon B Makgoeng; Nancy L Keating; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Sample Size and Power Calculations for Additive Interactions.

Authors:  T J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiol Methods       Date:  2012-08-01

5.  Health Care Access Among Asian American Subgroups: The Role of Residential Segregation.

Authors:  Daisy C Carreon; Sebastian E Baumeister
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-10

6.  Early-onset basal cell carcinoma and indoor tanning: a population-based study.

Authors:  Margaret R Karagas; M Scot Zens; Zhigang Li; Therese A Stukel; Ann E Perry; Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Vicki Sayarath; Rita S Stephenson; Dorothea Barton; Heather H Nelson; Steven K Spencer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Study protocol for a telephone-based smoking cessation randomized controlled trial in the lung cancer screening setting: The lung screening, tobacco, and health trial.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Danielle E Deros; Shelby Fallon; Jennifer Stephens; Emily Kim; Tania Lobo; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Jinani Jayasekera; Rafael Meza; Cassandra A Stanton; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Brady McKee; Judith Howell; Michael Ramsaier; Juan Batlle; Ellen Dornelas; Vicky Parikh; Eric Anderson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Refining the Candidate Environment: Interpersonal Stress, the Serotonin Transporter Polymorphism, and Gene-Environment Interactions in Major Depression.

Authors:  Suzanne Vrshek-Schallhorn; Susan Mineka; Richard E Zinbarg; Michelle G Craske; James W Griffith; Jonathan Sutton; Eva E Redei; Kate Wolitzky-Taylor; Constance Hammen; Emma K Adam
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-26

9.  What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The impact of obstetric unit closures on maternal and infant pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Sindhu K Srinivas; Corinne Ahlberg; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.