BACKGROUND: The restrictive, but not the obstructive respiratory dysfunction, is associated with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our aim was to verify in an elderly nondiabetic population whether a restrictive respiratory pattern was associated with a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome and increased insulin resistance than were obstructive and normal respiratory patterns. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 159 consecutive nondiabetic elderly persons attending two social centers. According to their spirometric pattern, volunteers were classified into the following categories: normal spirometry, obstructive (forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity<0.70), and restrictive pattern (forced vital capacity<80% predicted, forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity>or=0.70). Independent correlates of the metabolic syndrome were identified. RESULTS: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was higher in restrictive (56%) than in both normal (21.4%, p=.001) and obstructive volunteers (12.9%, p=.001). Insulin resistance, as assessed by the log transformation of the HOmeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA), was higher in restrictive than in obstructive and normal volunteers (1+/-0.6 vs 0.3+/-0.6 and 0.5+/-0.5, p<.001). Restriction was an independent correlate of metabolic syndrome, also after adjustment for waist circumference and body mass index (odds ratio=3.23, 95% confidence interval, 1.23-8.48; p=.01). CONCLUSION: Restrictive, but not obstructive respiratory pattern, is associated with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance, and does not only reflect a limitation of ventilation due to visceral obesity. Metabolic abnormalities likely mediate cardiovascular risk in patients with restrictive respiratory impairment.
BACKGROUND: The restrictive, but not the obstructive respiratory dysfunction, is associated with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our aim was to verify in an elderly nondiabetic population whether a restrictive respiratory pattern was associated with a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome and increased insulin resistance than were obstructive and normal respiratory patterns. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 159 consecutive nondiabetic elderly persons attending two social centers. According to their spirometric pattern, volunteers were classified into the following categories: normal spirometry, obstructive (forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity<0.70), and restrictive pattern (forced vital capacity<80% predicted, forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity>or=0.70). Independent correlates of the metabolic syndrome were identified. RESULTS: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was higher in restrictive (56%) than in both normal (21.4%, p=.001) and obstructive volunteers (12.9%, p=.001). Insulin resistance, as assessed by the log transformation of the HOmeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA), was higher in restrictive than in obstructive and normal volunteers (1+/-0.6 vs 0.3+/-0.6 and 0.5+/-0.5, p<.001). Restriction was an independent correlate of metabolic syndrome, also after adjustment for waist circumference and body mass index (odds ratio=3.23, 95% confidence interval, 1.23-8.48; p=.01). CONCLUSION: Restrictive, but not obstructive respiratory pattern, is associated with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance, and does not only reflect a limitation of ventilation due to visceral obesity. Metabolic abnormalities likely mediate cardiovascular risk in patients with restrictive respiratory impairment.
Authors: Cynthia W Baffi; Lisa Wood; Daniel Winnica; Patrick J Strollo; Mark T Gladwin; Loretta G Que; Fernando Holguin Journal: Chest Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Stefano Guerra; Duane L Sherrill; Claire Venker; Christina M Ceccato; Marilyn Halonen; Fernando D Martinez Journal: Thorax Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Michael D Weiden; Sophia Kwon; Erin Caraher; Kenneth I Berger; Joan Reibman; William N Rom; David J Prezant; Anna Nolan Journal: Semin Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 3.119
Authors: William W Chance; Chanhaeng Rhee; Cuneyt Yilmaz; D Merrill Dane; M Lourdes Pruneda; Philip Raskin; Connie C W Hsia Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 19.112