Literature DB >> 17634156

Antenatal exposure to DES: lessons learned...future concerns.

Mary M Rubin1.   

Abstract

The short- and long-term effects of the widespread use of diethylstilbestrol (DES) over 3 decades have become a distant memory for many clinicians. Others are too young to remember the flurry of activity in the early 1970s on the part of many medical centers to identify the offspring of women who were prescribed DES during their pregnancies. This medication was given in an attempt to prevent multiple pregnancy-related problems such as miscarriage, premature birth, and abnormal bleeding. The recognition of the association of DES with an increased incidence of cervical and vaginal cancers in very young women led the Food and Drug Administration to ban its use during pregnancy in 1971. Other pregnancy-related problems for the daughters and genitourinary tract changes in the sons did not become apparent until years later. Ongoing follow-up of these offspring has raised concerns for their future as well as their mothers' future. Clinicians need to be up-to-date with current knowledge regarding risks for cancer and other health-related issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17634156     DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000271138.31234.d7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN: 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  17 in total

1.  Neonatal diethylstilbestrol exposure disrupts female reproductive tract structure/function via both direct and indirect mechanisms in the hamster.

Authors:  Imala D Alwis; Dulce M Maroni; Isabel R Hendry; Shyamal K Roy; Jeffrey V May; Wendell W Leavitt; William J Hendry
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 2.  Endocrine disrupters: a review of some sources, effects, and mechanisms of actions on behaviour and neuroendocrine systems.

Authors:  C A Frye; E Bo; G Calamandrei; L Calzà; F Dessì-Fulgheri; M Fernández; L Fusani; O Kah; M Kajta; Y Le Page; H B Patisaul; A Venerosi; A K Wojtowicz; G C Panzica
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.627

Review 3.  Prospects for epigenetic epidemiology.

Authors:  Debra L Foley; Jeffrey M Craig; Ruth Morley; Craig A Olsson; Craig J Olsson; Terence Dwyer; Katherine Smith; Richard Saffery
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  EIDOS: a mechanistic classification of adverse drug effects.

Authors:  Robin E Ferner; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Dioxin may promote inflammation-related development of endometriosis.

Authors:  Kaylon L Bruner-Tran; Grant R Yeaman; Marta A Crispens; Toshio M Igarashi; Kevin G Osteen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  The pros and cons of phytoestrogens.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul; Wendy Jefferson
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 8.606

7.  TCDD-elicited effects on liver, serum, and adipose lipid composition in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Michelle Manente Angrish; Claudia Yvette Dominici; Timothy Richard Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Exposure to diethylstilbestrol during sensitive life stages: a legacy of heritable health effects.

Authors:  Casey E Reed; Suzanne E Fenton
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2013-06

Review 9.  Bisphenol A: Perinatal exposure and body weight.

Authors:  Beverly S Rubin; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 4.102

10.  Long-term effects of environmental endocrine disruptors on reproductive physiology and behavior.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul; Heather B Adewale
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.